Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Validation study of the apathy motivation index in French adults.

Xavier Corveleyn, Camille Corbel, Roxane Fabre, Radia Zeghari, Kathy Dujardin, Philippe Robert, Valeria Manera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xavier CorveleynLAPCOS, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Camille CorbelLAPCOS, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Roxane FabreCoBTeK Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Radia ZeghariCoBTeK Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Kathy DujardinCHU Lille, Lille Neurosciences and Cognition, INSERM, Université Lille, Lille, France.
Philippe RobertCoBTeK Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Valeria ManeraCoBTeK Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRMaison des Sciences de l'Homme · FRLille Neurosciences & CognitionUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Apathy is present in many brain disorders, but it is also prevalent to varying degrees in healthy people. While many tools have been developed to assess levels of apathy in pathology, no standardized measure of apathy in healthy people exists. Method: Therefore, this study aimed to validate the French version of the Apathy Motivation Index (f-AMI). The results of 729 participants were analyzed using an exploratory factorial analysis. Results: Preliminary analyses suggested that the three domains of apathy extracted in the original AMI scale-behavioral activation (BA), social motivation (SM), and emotional sensitivity (ES)-could be found also in the f-AMI. A further exploratory analysis showed that a higher number of factors could be extracted, particularly for women. Specifically, both social and emotional factors could be divided into two sub-factors: (1) social motivation toward strangers or toward an acquaintance and (2) self-directed emotional sensitivity directed toward others. Regarding construct validity, the scores of f-AMI were correlated with the French Dimensional Apathy Scale results. Concerning the divergent validity, emotional sensitivity in apathy is different from depression, anhedonia, and fatigue levels. Conclusion: These results suggest that the f-AMI can be used to assess levels of apathy in healthy adults.

Indexed as

apathyassessmenthealthy populationmotivationpreventionself-report scalestandardization

Identifiers

PMID37928593
PMCPMC10624122
OpenAlexW4387822228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.