Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928591›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Are vipers prototypic fear-evoking snakes? A cross-cultural comparison of Somalis and Czechs.

Daniel Frynta, Hassan Sh Abdirahman Elmi, Markéta Janovcová, Veronika Rudolfová, Iveta Štolhoferová, Kateřina Rexová, David Král, David Sommer, Daniel Alex Berti, Eva Landová and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Why Are Some Snakes More Terrifying and What Is Behind the Fear?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel FryntaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Hassan Sh Abdirahman ElmiDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Markéta JanovcováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Veronika RudolfováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Iveta ŠtolhoferováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Kateřina RexováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
David KrálDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
David SommerDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Daniel Alex BertiDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Eva LandováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Petra FrýdlováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Charles University · CZAmoud University · SO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakes are known as highly fear-evoking animals, eliciting preferential attention and fast detection in humans. We examined the human fear response to snakes in the context of both current and evolutionary experiences, conducting our research in the cradle of humankind, the Horn of Africa. This region is characterized by the frequent occurrence of various snake species, including deadly venomous viperids (adders) and elapids (cobras and mambas). We conducted experiments in Somaliland and compared the results with data from Czech respondents to address the still unresolved questions: To which extent is human fear of snakes affected by evolutionary or current experience and local culture? Can people of both nationalities recognize venomous snakes as a category, or are they only afraid of certain species that are most dangerous in a given area? Are respondents of both nationalities equally afraid of deadly snakes from both families (Viperidae, Elapidae)? We employed a well-established picture-sorting approach, consisting of 48 snake species belonging to four distinct groups. Our results revealed significant agreement among Somali as well as Czech respondents. We found a highly significant effect of the stimulus on perceived fear in both populations. Vipers appeared to be the most salient stimuli in both populations, as they occupied the highest positions according to the reported level of subjectively perceived fear. The position of vipers strongly contrasts with the fear ranking of deadly venomous elapids, which were in lower positions. Fear scores of vipers were significantly higher in both populations, and their best predictor was the body width of the snake. The evolutionary, cultural, and cognitive aspects of this phenomenon are discussed.

Indexed as

cross-cultural comparisonevolutionary psychologyfearophidiophobiaspecific phobias

Identifiers

PMID37928591
PMCPMC10620321
OpenAlexW4387778876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.