Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928495›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2023

Design, synthesis and analysis of charged RGD derivatives.

Bonaventure Mujyambere, Subasri Mohanakrishnan, Shoufia Jabeen Mubarak, Hemamalini Vedagiri, Sivasamy Ramasamy, Suja Samiappan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bonaventure MujyambereDepartment of Biochemistry, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Subasri MohanakrishnanDepartment of Biochemistry, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Shoufia Jabeen MubarakDepartment of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Hemamalini VedagiriDepartment of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Sivasamy RamasamyDepartment of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Suja SamiappanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Bharathiar University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, negatively charged N-Biotin-RGD and positively charged C-Biotin-RGD were designed, synthesized, and characterized with docking analysis. The fixation of MDA-MB-231 cells with formalin made their cell surface neutrally charged thus removing the electrostatic interactions between charged biotinylated RGD derivatives and MDA-MB-231 cells. The results of the binding affinity of biotinylated RGD derivatives against MDA-MB-231 cells showed that N-Biotin-RGD had higher binding affinity than C-Biotin-RGD. The cytotoxic effect was analyzed by incubating charged biotinylated RGD derivatives with live MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cell surface is negatively charged due to high hypersialyliation of polyglycans and Warburg effect. The results of their cytotoxic activities against live MDA-MB-231 cells were found to be electrostatic in nature. C-Biotin-RGD had an attractive interaction with the MDA-MB-231 cell surface resulting in a higher cytotoxic effect. In comparison, N-Biotin-RGD had a repulsive interaction with the MDA-MB-231 cell surface resulting in a lower cytotoxic effect. Hence, positively charged C-Biotin-RGD is a better cytotoxic agent than a negatively charged N-Biotin-RGD against MDA-MB-231 cells.

Indexed as

analysischarged RGD derivativesDesignsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID37928495
PMCPMC10625369
OpenAlexW4387444959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.