Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study: a study on the safety and clinical efficacy of AZVUDINE in moderate COVID-19 patients.

Sávio Bastos de Souza, Paula Gebe Abreu Cabral, Renato Martins da Silva, Raul Ferraz Arruda, Sheila Passos de Figueiredo Cabral, Arícia Leone Evangelista Monteiro de Assis, Antônio Brazil Viana Junior, Wim Maurits Sylvain Degrave, Aline Dos Santos Moreira, Cléber Glória Silva and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Real-World Evaluation Study of Azvudine for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sávio Bastos de SouzaHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Paula Gebe Abreu CabralHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Renato Martins da SilvaHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Raul Ferraz ArrudaHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Sheila Passos de Figueiredo CabralHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Arícia Leone Evangelista Monteiro de AssisHigh Complexity Center, Galzu Institute, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Antônio Brazil Viana JuniorUFC/Ebserh University Hospital Complex, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Wim Maurits Sylvain DegraveFunctional Genomics and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Aline Dos Santos MoreiraFunctional Genomics and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cléber Glória SilvaSanta Casa de Misericórdia de Campos Hospital, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Junbiao ChangNMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Pingsheng LeiInstitute of Material Medical, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Prefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHenan Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2019, a highly pathogenic coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) surfaced and resulted in the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With the aim of finding effective drugs to fight against the disease, several trials have been conducted since COVID-19 can only be considered a treatable disease, from a clinical point of view, after the availability of specific and effective antivirals. AZVUDINE (FNC), initially developed for treating HIV, is a potential treatment for COVID-19 as it has the capability to lower the patient's viral load and promote recovery. Methods: Volunteers infected with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), with good kidney and liver function, who were not using other antivirals or monoclonal antibodies were eligible. Samples from patients were assessed for viral load every 48 h during treatment using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). Results: The study's primary outcome measure was the percentage of participants showing an improvement in clinical scores, while the secondary outcome measure was the percentage of participants with a clinical outcome of cure. These measures were used to assess the safety and efficacy of FNC for treating COVID-19. In the analysis of sociodemographic variables, no significant differences were detected between patients in the FNC and the placebo group for race, age group, or sex. The results showed a potential benefit to participants who received FNC during the study, as observed in the shorter hospital stay, shorter negative conversion time of SARS-CoV-2, and a significant reduction in viral load. Furthermore, the reduction in fever and chills were significant at D1, D2, and D3. In this study, a total of 112 adverse events cases were noted, with 105 cases being categorized as non-serious and only 7 cases as serious adverse events. Conclusion: The pandemic is not being effectively controlled and is causing multiple waves of infection that require extensive medical resources. However, FNC has demonstrated potential to reduce the treatment duration of moderate COVID-19 cases, thereby saving significant medical resources. This makes FNC a promising candidate for COVID-19 treatment.

Indexed as

AZVUDINECOVID-19FNCSARS-CoV-2viral load

Identifiers

PMID37928473
PMCPMC10620601
OpenAlexW4387779837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.