Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Climate-specific health literacy in health professionals: an exploratory study.

Lorenz Albrecht, Lydia Reismann, Michael Leitzmann, Christine Bernardi, Julia von Sommoggy, Andrea Weber, Carmen Jochem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Planetary Health in Nursing: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenz AlbrechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lydia ReismannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christine BernardiDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Julia von SommoggyDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andrea WeberDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Carmen JochemDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health professionals such as physicians and nurses may play an important role in the transformation process towards a healthy, sustainable and climate-sensitive society. However, little is known about their climate-specific health literacy. This study aimed to assess knowledge regarding climate change and its impacts on health and climate-specific health literacy in health professionals. Methods: In July/August 2022, a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was carried out at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany, to assess climate-specific health literacy in nurses and physicians from various clinical specialties. Descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses were performed. Results: The study population consisted of 142 participants (57.7% women; response rate: 24,7%). Most participants (93%) considered climate change to be highly relevant. However, only 12% of respondents stated to be very well informed regarding the general consequences of climate change. Although 57% of all participants had never mentioned climate change in relation to health to their patients, participants with higher levels of knowledge regarding the effects of climate change were more likely to mention it compared to those with lower levels of knowledge. The most frequently stated obstacle to integrate the topic of climate change in clinical work was lack of time during work (79%), not enough information (42%) and lacking materials (39%). Differences between health professions were apparent. Conclusion: The results of our survey suggest that the current state of climate-specific health literacy differs between different groups of health professionals. There is a need to improve health professionals' levels of climate-specific health literacy and to increase the potential in interprofessional cooperation regarding planetary health.

Indexed as

climate changeclimate-specific health literacyhealth professionalsnursesphysicians

Identifiers

PMID37928468
PMCPMC10622978
OpenAlexW4387818559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.