ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Finetuning of GLIDE stable diffusion model for AI-based text-conditional image synthesis of dermoscopic images.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bias, representation, and clinical fidelity in AI-generated images for medical education: a systematic literature review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Diffusion Models in Oncology: a Review of Current Applications.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- A hybrid model for improved nail disease classification using vision transformers and stable diffusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Representation of Demographics in Otolaryngology by Artificial Intelligence Text-to-Image Platforms.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Generative AI for Diagnostic Medical Imaging: A Review.Current medical imaging · 2025Review
- The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From Computer Science to Machine and Deep Learning.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- Health Economic Consequences Associated With COVID-19-Related Delay in Melanoma Diagnosis in Europe.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Possible Explanations for Rising Melanoma Rates Despite Increased Sunscreen Use over the Past Several Decades.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms and advances in medical domains rely on large datasets. A recent advancement in text-to-image generative AI is GLIDE (Guided Language to Image Diffusion for Generation and Editing). There are a number of representations available in the GLIDE model, but it has not been refined for medical applications. Methods: For text-conditional image synthesis with classifier-free guidance, we have fine-tuned GLIDE using 10,015 dermoscopic images of seven diagnostic entities, including melanoma and melanocytic nevi. Photorealistic synthetic samples of each diagnostic entity were created by the algorithm. Following this, an experienced dermatologist reviewed 140 images (20 of each entity), with 10 samples originating from artificial intelligence and 10 from original images from the dataset. The dermatologist classified the provided images according to the seven diagnostic entities. Additionally, the dermatologist was asked to indicate whether or not a particular image was created by AI. Further, we trained a deep learning model to compare the diagnostic results of dermatologist versus machine for entity classification. Results: The results indicate that the generated images possess varying degrees of quality and realism, with melanocytic nevi and melanoma having higher similarity to real images than other classes. The integration of synthetic images improved the classification performance of the model, resulting in higher accuracy and precision. The AI assessment showed superior classification performance compared to dermatologist. Conclusion: Overall, the results highlight the potential of synthetic images for training and improving AI models in dermatology to overcome data scarcity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.