Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Finetuning of GLIDE stable diffusion model for AI-based text-conditional image synthesis of dermoscopic images.

Veronika Shavlokhova, Andreas Vollmer, Christos C Zouboulis, Michael Vollmer, Jakob Wollborn, Gernot Lang, Alexander Kübler, Stefan Hartmann, Christian Stoll, Elisabeth Roider and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Veronika ShavlokhovaMaxillofacial Surgery University Hospital Ruppin-Fehrbelliner Straße Neuruppin, Neuruppin, Germany.
Andreas VollmerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christos C ZouboulisDepartments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology, Staedtisches Klinikum Dessau, Medical School Theodor Fontane and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Dessau, Germany.
Michael VollmerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jakob WollbornDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Gernot LangDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Centre-Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexander KüblerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan HartmannDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian StollMaxillofacial Surgery University Hospital Ruppin-Fehrbelliner Straße Neuruppin, Neuruppin, Germany.
Elisabeth RoiderDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Babak SaraviDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms and advances in medical domains rely on large datasets. A recent advancement in text-to-image generative AI is GLIDE (Guided Language to Image Diffusion for Generation and Editing). There are a number of representations available in the GLIDE model, but it has not been refined for medical applications. Methods: For text-conditional image synthesis with classifier-free guidance, we have fine-tuned GLIDE using 10,015 dermoscopic images of seven diagnostic entities, including melanoma and melanocytic nevi. Photorealistic synthetic samples of each diagnostic entity were created by the algorithm. Following this, an experienced dermatologist reviewed 140 images (20 of each entity), with 10 samples originating from artificial intelligence and 10 from original images from the dataset. The dermatologist classified the provided images according to the seven diagnostic entities. Additionally, the dermatologist was asked to indicate whether or not a particular image was created by AI. Further, we trained a deep learning model to compare the diagnostic results of dermatologist versus machine for entity classification. Results: The results indicate that the generated images possess varying degrees of quality and realism, with melanocytic nevi and melanoma having higher similarity to real images than other classes. The integration of synthetic images improved the classification performance of the model, resulting in higher accuracy and precision. The AI assessment showed superior classification performance compared to dermatologist. Conclusion: Overall, the results highlight the potential of synthetic images for training and improving AI models in dermatology to overcome data scarcity.

Indexed as

cancerdermatologydermoscopyGLIDEstable diffusiontext-to-image

Identifiers

PMID37928464
PMCPMC10623307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.