Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928373›Full record

ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2023

Statement by the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine on the proposed reform of working hours in South Korea.

Hee-Tae Kang, Chul-Ju Kim, Dong-Wook Lee, Seung-Gwon Park, Jinwoo Lee, Kanwoo Youn, Hwan-Cheol Kim, Kyoung Sook Jeong, Hansoo Song, Sung-Kyung Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Special Series I: Working hours as a social determinant of workers' health.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hee-Tae KangInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-814X
Chul-Ju KimInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7136-4816
Dong-Wook LeeInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4023-3269
Seung-Gwon ParkInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0801-3525
Jinwoo LeeInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3705-1948
Kanwoo YounInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-9310
Hwan-Cheol KimInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1297
Kyoung Sook JeongInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6897-8289
Hansoo SongInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-1572
Sung-Kyung KimInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-6410
Sang-Baek KohInstitutional Improvement Committee of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5609-6521
Improvement Service · GBYonsei University · KRCheongju University · KRUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current 52-hour workweek in South Korea consists of 40 hours of regular work and 12 hours of overtime. Although the average working hours in South Korea is declining, it is still 199 hours longer than the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development average of 1,716 hours per year. In view to this, the South Korean government has now proposed to reform the workweek, mainly intending to increase the workweek to 69 hours when the workload is heavy. This reform, by increasing the labor intensity due to long working hours, goes against the global trend of reducing work hours for a safe and healthy working environment. Long working hours can lead to increased cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases, industrial accidents, mental health problems, and safety accidents due to lack of concentration. In conclusion, the Korean government's working hour reform plan can have a negative impact on workers' health, and therefore it should be thoroughly reviewed and modified.

Indexed as

AccidentsCardiovascular diseasesCerebrovascular diseasesMental healthSleepWork

Identifiers

PMID37928373
PMCPMC10622250
OpenAlexW4385685185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.