ArticleBioinformatics advances2023
The impact of similarity metrics on cell-type clustering in highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry data.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- dioscRi enables transferable prediction of clinical outcomes in multi-parameter cytometry data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- CAR19 Tregs treat murine chronic graft-versus-host disease through immune suppression without measurable B cell cytolysis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Tissue-wide profiling of human lungs reveals spatial sequestration of macrophages in tuberculosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: The advent of highly multiplexed in situ imaging cytometry assays has revolutionized the study of cellular systems, offering unparalleled detail in observing cellular activities and characteristics. These assays provide comprehensive insights by concurrently profiling the spatial distribution and molecular features of numerous cells. In navigating this complex data landscape, unsupervised machine learning techniques, particularly clustering algorithms, have become essential tools. They enable the identification and categorization of cell types and subsets based on their molecular characteristics. Despite their widespread adoption, most clustering algorithms in use were initially developed for cell suspension technologies, leading to a potential mismatch in application. There is a critical gap in the systematic evaluation of these methods, particularly in determining the properties that make them optimal for in situ imaging assays. Addressing this gap is vital for ensuring accurate, reliable analyses and fostering advancements in cellular biology research. Results: In our extensive investigation, we evaluated a range of similarity metrics, which are crucial in determining the relationships between cells during the clustering process. Our findings reveal substantial variations in clustering performance, contingent on the similarity metric employed. These variations underscore the importance of selecting appropriate metrics to ensure accurate cell type and subset identification. In response to these challenges, we introduce FuseSOM, a novel ensemble clustering algorithm that integrates hierarchical multiview learning of similarity metrics with self-organizing maps. Through a rigorous stratified subsampling analysis framework, we demonstrate that FuseSOM outperforms existing best-practice clustering methods specifically tailored for in situ imaging cytometry data. Our work not only provides critical insights into the performance of clustering algorithms in this novel context but also offers a robust solution, paving the way for more accurate and reliable in situ imaging cytometry data analysis. Availability and implementation: The FuseSOM R package is available on Bioconductor and is available under the GPL-3 license. All the codes for the analysis performed can be found at Github.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.