Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928326›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Virtual reality use and patient outcomes in palliative care: A scoping review.

Mairead Moloney, Owen Doody, Martina O'Reilly, Michael Lucey, Joanne Callinan, Chris Exton, Simon Colreavy, Frances O'Mahony, Pauline Meskell, Alice Coffey

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567391 (Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07567391 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Quality of Life and Cultural Adaptation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BishaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, CaregiversArmsImmersive Nature VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mairead MoloneyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-5993
Owen DoodyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Martina O'ReillyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland.
Michael LuceyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland.
Joanne CallinanMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-059X
Chris ExtonDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Simon ColreavyDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-6995
Frances O'MahonyMilford Care Centre, Limerick, Ireland.
Pauline MeskellDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Alice CoffeyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Virtual reality is increasingly used in healthcare settings. Potentially, it's use in palliative carecould have a positive impact; however, there is limited evidence on the scope, purpose and patient outcomes relating to virtual reality use in this context. The objective of this scoping review is to chart the literature on virtual reality use in palliative care, identifying any evidence relating to biopsychosocial patient outcomes which could support its use in practice. Methods: A scoping review of the literature, involving . a systematic search across 10 electronic bibliographic databases in December 2021, . Eligibility criteria were primary research studies, of any research designwithin a 10-year timeframe, which reported on virtual reality use and patient outcomes in palliative care. A total of 993 papers were identified, andcomprehensive screening resulted in 10 papers for inclusion. Results: This scoping review identified 10 papers addressing virtual reality in palliative care, published within a three-year timeframe 2019-2021. Research methodologies included mixed methods, quantitative and qualitative. The evidence highlightsvirtual reality use with patients receiving palliative care in a variety of settings, and data around useability, feasibility and acceptability is positive. However, the evidence regarding biopsychosocial patient outcomes linked to virtual reality use is limited. Conclusion: Virtual reality is gathering momentum in palliative care and is potentially a helpful intervention; however more research is needed to underpin the evidence base supporting its application, particularly in understanding the impact on biopsychosocial patient outcomes and ascertaining the best approach for measuring intervention effectiveness.

Indexed as

palliative carepatient outcomesscoping reviewVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37928326
PMCPMC10621306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.