Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928254›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023

Cerium oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis methods and applications in wound healing.

Hamed Nosrati, Morteza Heydari, Mohammad Khodaei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multifactorial Role of Phytogenic CeOPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sustainably Synthesized CeOMicromachines · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Lanthanide Nanotheranostics in Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamed NosratiBiosensor Research Center (BRC), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Isfahan, Iran.
Morteza HeydariDepartment of Immune Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mohammad KhodaeiMaterials Engineering Group, Golpayegan College of Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Golpayegan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Technology · IRUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound care and treatment can be critical from a clinical standpoint. While different strategies for the management and treatment of skin wounds have been developed, the limitations inherent in the current approaches necessitate the development of more effective alternative strategies. Advances in tissue engineering have resulted in the development of novel promising approaches for accelerating wound healing. The use of various biomaterials capable of accelerating the regeneration of damaged tissue is critical in tissue engineering. In this regard, cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO

Indexed as

BiosynthesisCerium oxide nanoparticlesNanocomposite scaffoldsSkin tissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID37928254
PMCPMC10622885
OpenAlexW4387231997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.