Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928209›Full record

ReviewWellcome open research2023

Public engagement with genomics.

Anna Middleton, Avery Adams, Hugbaad Aidid, Jerome Atutornu, Daniela Boraschi, Julian Borra, Tuba Bircan, Claudette Burch, Alessia Costa, Anna Dickinson and 21 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wellcome open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Anna MiddletonWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-8098
Avery AdamsRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.
Hugbaad AididWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Jerome AtutornuWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Daniela BoraschiKavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
Julian BorraThe Thin Air Factory Ltd, London, England, UK.
Tuba BircanWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Claudette BurchKavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
Alessia CostaWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-9080
Anna DickinsonScience and Technology, Onward, London, England, UK.
Ann EnticknapWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Catherine GallowayKavli Centre for Ethics, Science and the Public, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
Francesca GaleWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Emma GarlickWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Em HaydonWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9840-0398
Sasha HenriquesWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0422-6468
Marion MitchellWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Richard MilneWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-2384
Jack MonaghanWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Katherine I MorleyRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2725-5535
Milena Muella SantosWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Laura Olivares BolduWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9665-3937
Fifi OlumogbaRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-562X
Kate OrvissPublic Policy Projects, London, England, UK.
Vivienne ParryGenomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, UK.
Christine PatchWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Lauren RobartsWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Sam ShinglesWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Cindy SmidtWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Ben TomlinWellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, England, UK.
Sarah ParkinsonRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-1842

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As detailed in its flagship report, Genome UK, the UK government recognises the vital role that broad public engagement across whole populations plays in the field of genomics. However, there is limited evidence about how to do this at scale. Most public audiences do not feel actively connected to science, are oftenunsure of the relevance to their lives and rarely talk to their family and friends about; we term this dis-connection a 'disengaged public audience'. We use a narrative review to explore: (i) UK attitudes towards genetics and genomics and what may influence reluctance to engage with these topics; (ii) innovative public engagement approaches that have been used to bring diverse public audiences into conversations about the technology. Whilst we have found some novel engagement methods that have used participatory arts, film, social media and deliberative methods, there is no clear agreement on best practice. We did not find a consistently used, evidence-based strategy for delivering public engagement about genomics across diverse and broad populations, nor a specific method that is known to encourage engagement from groups that have historically felt (in terms of perception) and been (in reality) excluded from genomic research. We argue there is a need for well-defined, tailor-made engagement strategies that clearly articulate the audience, the purpose and the proposed impact of the engagement intervention. This needs to be coupled with robust evaluation frameworks to build the evidence-base for population-level engagement strategies.

Indexed as

Genetics; genomics; public engagement; Responsible Research and Innovation; inclusivity; participation

Identifiers

PMID37928209
PMCPMC10624956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.