ReviewFrontiers in neurology2023
Navigating complexity: a comprehensive review of microcatheter shaping techniques in endovascular aneurysm embolization.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalized peripheral vascular interventional embolization for tumor: tailoring treatment to improve outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endovascular intervention technique has gained prominence in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to its minimal invasiveness and shorter recovery time. A critical step of the intervention is the shaping of the microcatheter, which ensures its accurate placement and stability within the aneurysm sac. This is vital for enhancing coil placement and minimizing the risk of catheter kickback during the coiling process. Currently, microcatheter shaping is primarily reliant on the operator's experience, who shapes them based on the curvature of the target vessel and aneurysm location, utilizing 3D rotational angiography or CT angiography. Some researchers have documented their experiences with conventional shaping methods. Additionally, some scholars have explored auxiliary techniques such as 3D printing and computer simulations to facilitate microcatheter shaping. However, the shaping of microcatheters can still pose challenges, especially in cases with complex anatomical structures or very small aneurysms, and even experienced operators may encounter difficulties, and there has been a lack of a holistic summary of microcatheter shaping techniques in the literature. In this article, we present a review of the literature from 1994 to 2023 on microcatheter shaping techniques in endovascular aneurysm embolization. Our review aims to present a thorough overview of the various experiences and techniques shared by researchers over the last 3 decades, provides an analysis of shaping methods, and serves as an invaluable resource for both novice and experienced practitioners, highlighting the significance of understanding and mastering this technique for successful endovascular intervention in intracranial aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.