Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Machine learning-based prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: a large multicenter study.

Rui Wen, Miaoran Wang, Wei Bian, Haoyue Zhu, Ying Xiao, Qian He, Yu Wang, Xiaoqing Liu, Yangdi Shi, Zhe Hong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Advanced Machine Learning Models for Predicting Post-Thrombolysis Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui WenShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Miaoran WangAffiliated Central Hospital of Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Wei BianShenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Haoyue ZhuShenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Ying XiaoShenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Qian HeShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Yu WangShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Xiaoqing LiuShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Yangdi ShiShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Zhe HongShenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China.
Bing XuShenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Shenyang Ninth People's Hospital · CNShenyang Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the performance of different machine learning models in predicting symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after thrombolysis treatment for ischemic stroke. Methods: This multicenter study utilized the Shenyang Stroke Emergency Map database, comprising 8,924 acute ischemic stroke patients from 29 comprehensive hospitals who underwent thrombolysis between January 2019 and December 2021. An independent testing cohort was further established, including 1,921 patients from the First People's Hospital of Shenyang. The structured dataset encompassed 15 variables, including clinical and therapeutic metrics. The primary outcome was the sICH occurrence post-thrombolysis. Models were developed using an 80/20 split for training and internal validation. Performance was assessed using machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression with lasso regularization, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). The model boasting the highest area under the curve (AUC) was specifically employed to highlight feature importance. Results: Baseline characteristics were compared between the training cohort ( Conclusion: After a comprehensive evaluation, the MLP model is recommended due to its superior ability to predict the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage post-thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients. Based on decision curve analysis, the MLP-based model was chosen and demonstrated enhanced discriminative ability compared to the reference. This model serves as a valuable tool for clinicians, aiding in treatment planning and ensuring more precise forecasting of patient outcomes.

Indexed as

intravenous thrombolysismachine learningmulticenterpredictionstrokesymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID37928151
PMCPMC10624225
OpenAlexW4387807233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.