Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37928028›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

A segmentation model to detect cevical lesions based on machine learning of colposcopic images.

Zhen Li, Chu-Mei Zeng, Yan-Gang Dong, Ying Cao, Li-Yao Yu, Hui-Ying Liu, Xun Tian, Rui Tian, Chao-Yue Zhong, Ting-Ting Zhao and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Zhen LiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China.
Chu-Mei ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Yan-Gang DongInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, the South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Ying CaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician expert workstation, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, China.
Li-Yao YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician expert workstation, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, China.
Hui-Ying LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Xun TianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academician expert workstation, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, China.
Rui Tianthe Generulor Company Bio-X Lab, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519060, China.
Chao-Yue Zhongthe Generulor Company Bio-X Lab, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519060, China.
Ting-Ting Zhaothe Generulor Company Bio-X Lab, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519060, China.
Jia-Shuo LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Ye ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Li-Fang LiDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Zhe-Ying HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Yu-Yan WangDepartment of Obstetrics and gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510062, China.
Zheng HuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China.
Jingjing ZhangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China.
Jiu-Xing LiangInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, the South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510631, China.
Ping ZhouDepartment of Gynecology, Dongguan Maternal and Child Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523057, China.
Yi-Qin LuDepartment of Gynecology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 101121, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Semantic segmentation is crucial in medical image diagnosis. Traditional deep convolutional neural networks excel in image classification and object detection but fall short in segmentation tasks. Enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of detecting high-level cervical lesions and invasive cancer poses a primary challenge in segmentation model development. Methods: Between 2018 and 2022, we retrospectively studied a total of 777 patients, comprising 339 patients with high-level cervical lesions and 313 patients with microinvasive or invasive cervical cancer. Overall, 1554 colposcopic images were put into the DeepLabv3+ model for learning. Accuracy, Precision, Specificity, and mIoU were employed to evaluate the performance of the model in the prediction of cervical high-level lesions and cancer. Results: Experiments showed that our segmentation model had better diagnosis efficiency than colposcopic experts and other artificial intelligence models, and reached Accuracy of 93.29 %, Precision of 87.2 %, Specificity of 90.1 %, and mIoU of 80.27 %, respectively. Conclution: The DeepLabv3+ model had good performance in the segmentation of cervical lesions in colposcopic post-acetic-acid images and can better assist colposcopists in improving the diagnosis.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceColposcopyDiagnosisHSILSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37928028
PMCPMC10623278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.