Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927965›Full record

ReviewSAGE open nursing

Determinants of Medical Equipment Alarm Fatigue in Practicing Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Chen Shaoru, Zhi Hui, Wu Su, Jiang Ruxin, Zhang Huiyi, Zhang Hongmei, Zhang Hongyan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen ShaoruDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-6598
Zhi HuiDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wu SuDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jiang RuxinDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhang HuiyiDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhang HongmeiHenan Evidence-based Nursing Centre: A JBI Affiliated Group, The University of Adelaide, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhang HongyanDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital; Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the level of medical equipment alarm fatigue and its influencing factors among clinical nurses. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched to identify articles on alarm fatigue of clinical nurses published before September 25, 2022. According to the evaluation criteria of prevalence studies recommended by JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center, the quality of the literature meeting the inclusion criteria was evaluated, and Stata MP17 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 14 cross-sectional studies were included, with a total sample of 2,848 nurses. The results showed that the alarm fatigue score of clinical nurses was 21.76 (95% CI [20.27, 23.25]). Subgroup analysis showed that the nurses who worked night shift and had lower professional title had higher alarm fatigue. Conclusion: The alarm fatigue of clinical nurses was at a moderate level. To reduce the alarm fatigue level of clinical nurses, nursing managers should strengthen the alarm safety awareness of nurses, rationally arrange nurse manpower, carry out training to actively improve the alarm management ability of nurses, and optimize the alarm level and frequency of alarm equipment.

Indexed as

alarm fatiguenursesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37927965
PMCPMC10621293
OpenAlexW4388183949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.