Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927933›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Robotic-assisted colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: Short-term surgical outcomes of a multi-institutional prospective cohort study in Japan.

Shinichi Yamauchi, Akio Shiomi, Chu Matsuda, Ichiro Takemasa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Mamoru Uemura, Yusuke Kinugasa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Essential Updates 2024-2026: Advances in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichi YamauchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-5323
Akio ShiomiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-8686
Chu MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Ichiro TakemasaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science Sapporo Medical University Hokkaido Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-2453
Tsunekazu HanaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Fujita Health University Aichi Japan.
Mamoru UemuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan.
Yusuke KinugasaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPFujita Health University · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPSapporo Medical University · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Japan, there are no substantial reports on robotic-assisted colectomy because few institutions performed the procedure, as it was not covered by national insurance until March 2022. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted colectomy for patients with curatively resectable colon cancer in Japan. Methods: This multi-institutional, prospective, single-arm, observational study enrolled patients diagnosed with curatively resectable clinical stage I-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma with D2 or D3 lymph node dissection and treated with robotic-assisted colectomy. The primary endpoint was the conversion rate to laparotomy. The non-inferiority of outcomes for robotic-assisted colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy, which was determined from historical data, was verified. Results: One hundred patients were registered between July 2019 and March 2022 and underwent robotic-assisted colectomy performed by seven expert surgeons at six institutions. Thirteen patients were excluded because their surgeons had insufficient experience performing robotic-assisted colectomy; therefore, 87 patients were eligible for the primary endpoint analysis. There was no conversion in these 87 patients, and robotic-assisted colectomy was non-inferior to laparoscopic colectomy in terms of conversion rate (90% confidence interval 0-3.38, Conclusion: This study showed the non-inferiority of the conversion rates between robotic-assisted colectomy and laparoscopic colectomy. Favorable perioperative outcomes also suggest the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted colectomy.

Indexed as

colectomycolon cancerlaparoscopyminimally invasive surgical proceduresrobotics

Identifiers

PMID37927933
PMCPMC10623957
OpenAlexW4377987408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.