Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927931›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

A discrimination model by machine learning to avoid gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Tsutomu Hayashi, Ken Takasawa, Takaki Yoshikawa, Taiki Hashimoto, Shigeki Sekine, Takeyuki Wada, Yukinori Yamagata, Haruhisa Suzuki, Seiichirou Abe, Shigetaka Yoshinaga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence models in predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta -analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tsutomu HayashiDepartment of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-8269
Ken TakasawaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development National Cancer Center Research Institute Tokyo Japan.
Takaki YoshikawaDepartment of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-9484
Taiki HashimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-9243
Shigeki SekineDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Takeyuki WadaDepartment of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yukinori YamagataDepartment of Gastric Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Haruhisa SuzukiEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Seiichirou AbeEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Shigetaka YoshinagaEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Nobuji KounoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development National Cancer Center Research Institute Tokyo Japan.
Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development National Cancer Center Research Institute Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Gastrectomy is recommended for patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) because the possibility of lymph node metastasis (LNM) cannot be completely denied. The aim of this study was to develop a discrimination model to select patients who do not require surgery using machine learning. Methods: Data from 382 patients who received gastrectomy for gastric cancer and who were diagnosed with pT1b were extracted for developing a discrimination model. For the validation of this discrimination model, data from 140 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection followed by gastrectomy, with a diagnosis of pT1b EGC, were extracted. We applied XGBoost to develop a discrimination model for clinical and pathological variables. The performance of the discrimination model was evaluated based on the number of cases classified as true negatives for LNM, with no false negatives for LNM allowed. Results: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 95 patients (25%) in the development cohort and 11 patients (8%) in the validation cohort. The discrimination model was developed to identify 27 (7%) patients with no indications for additional surgery due to the prediction of an LNM-negative status with no false negatives. In the validation cohort, 13 (9%) patients were identified as having no indications for additional surgery and no patients with LNM were classified into this group. Conclusion: The discrimination model using XGBoost algorithms could select patients with no risk of LNM from patients with pT1b EGC. This discrimination model was considered promising for clinical decision-making in relation to patients with EGC.

Indexed as

discrimination modelearly gastric cancerlymph node metastasismachine learningsurgical indication

Identifiers

PMID37927931
PMCPMC10623978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.