Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927929›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Impact of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Ikuo Nakamura, Etsuro Hatano, Hideo Baba, Keiko Kamei, Hiroshi Wada, Junzo Shimizu, Masashi Kanai, Kenichi Yoshimura, Hiroaki Nagano, Tatsuya Ioka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ikuo NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Hyogo Medical University Hyogo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-9023
Etsuro HatanoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2550
Keiko KameiDepartment of Surgery Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Osakasayama Japan.
Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Junzo ShimizuDepartment of Surgery Toyonaka Municipal Hospital Toyonaka Japan.
Masashi KanaiDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Pharmacogenomics, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Kenichi YoshimuraCenter for Integrated Medical Research Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Yamaguchi University Yamaguchi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7074-3315
Tatsuya IokaOncology Center Yamaguchi University Hospital Ube Japan.
Kyoto University · JPHiroshima University · JPHyogo University · JPKindai University · JPKumamoto University · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JPYamaguchi University · JPYamaguchi University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy was superior to gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for progression-free survival and overall survival for unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in a randomized phase III trial (KHBO1401). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients (ancillary study, KHBO1401-3C). Methods: A total of 246 patients were enrolled in KHBO1401. We compared progression-free and overall survivals between the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups. Results: Eight patients (3.3%) underwent conversion surgery with chemotherapy, seven of whom were diagnosed with unresectable disease and one with recurrence. Six and two patients received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy as well as gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy, respectively. Three patients in the conversion surgery group who received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 chemotherapy showed no disease progression and survived without postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level was a prognostic factor for conversion surgery. After correcting for immortal time bias, 1-year progression-free survival rates in the conversion surgery and non-conversion surgery groups were 50.0% and 19.0%, respectively (hazard ratio 0.343, 95% confidence interval 0.286-0.843, Conclusions: Conversion surgery might be an option for the treatment of unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer in patients with normal preoperative CA19-9 level.

Indexed as

biliary tract cancerchemotherapycisplatinconversion surgerygemcitabineS‐1

Identifiers

PMID37927929
PMCPMC10623972
OpenAlexW4384823887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.