ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023
Dose dependent effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on pain and function in osteonecrosis of femoral head: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic mapping review of applications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in hand surgery.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- No dose response effect in shockwave therapy applied to bone conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of different dosages of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain, function and radiographic outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH). Procedure: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis) guidelines were followed to conduct this review. The systematic literature search was done by using six different electronic databases include MEDLINE (assessed by Pubmed) CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Scopus and Science Direct. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies; case control study, randomized clinical trials were included. Screening conducted by two independent authors along with inclusion and exclusion criteria of included studies. The methodological quality assessment for cohort studies and randomized clinical trials was done by using Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control study. Result: Total 1410 articles were found from various databases. After duplicates removed 450 articles remained. Followed by title and abstract screening 53 articles eligible for full text reading, out of them 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in this review. Conclusion: High energy flux densities of ESWT found to be more effective followed by low and moderate energy flux densities in earlier course of the disease compared to later stages in terms of pain relief, functional improvement and disease progression. Due to high variability among study design, ESWT dosages, patient characteristics and considering the paucity of well conducted studies, the present study cannot be conclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.