ArticleSleep medicine: X2023
Knowledge, attitude, and practices of Filipino adult neurologists on obstructive sleep apnea among stroke patients.
Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Filipino adult neurologists in the recognition and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients presenting with acute stroke. Methodology: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted using a web-based survey from April to June 2022 among active locally-practicing adult neurology fellows of the Philippine Neurological Association. The 18-item knowledge statements from the validated "Obstructive Sleep Apnea Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA) Questionnaire was used as survey instrument. There were also eight additional items assessing knowledge, six items assessing attitudes, and ten items assessing practices that were included. Results: A total of 119 neurologists participated in the survey. Two-thirds of the respondents were females, and 70 % were between 31 and 40 years old. Majority of the respondents are General Neurologists (57.1 %) followed by Neurophysiologists (10 %) and Stroke Specialists (10 %). Forty-seven percent of neurologists got more than or equal to 75 % of the knowledge statements included in the OSAKA questionnaire correctly. Less than half of the respondents correctly answered the questions on (1) uvulopalatopharyngoplasty as curative for majority of patients with OSA (32.8 %), (2) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy can cause nasal congestion (42.9 %), (3) laser-assisted uvuloplasty as treatment for severe OSA (16.8 %), and (4) less than 5 apneas is normal in adults (48.7 %). Majority (>80 %) of the respondents were able to correctly answer the statements relating OSA and stroke. Almost all agreed that OSA as a clinical disorder (95 %) is important and that acute stroke patients with possible OSA needs to be identified (94.1 %) and further evaluated (96.6 %). On the other hand, less than half of the respondents feel confident in: identifying patients at-risk for OSA (47.9 %), ability to manage acute stroke patients with OSA (34.5 %), and ability to manage acute stroke patients with OSA on CPAP therapy (21 %). Most neurologists would sometimes screen OSA among their patients with acute stroke (55.5 %). Most respondents would only educate their patients on OSA sometimes (43.7 %). With regards to the diagnosis (42 %), risk factors (42 %), and treatment options for OSA (40.3 %), most would discuss them with their patients. Conclusion: Less than half of neurologists were able to get at least 75 % of the knowledge questions. Majority had difficulty with statements pertaining to surgery as cure for OSA, CPAP therapy causing nasal congestion, and OSA severity classification. Almost all has a positive attitude towards the importance of OSA diagnosis and management; however, there is low confidence among them with regards to their practice in identification and handling of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.