Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927806›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Preoperative Frailty Assessed Comprehensively by a Questionnaire Predicts a Poor Survival Following Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer.

Tatsuro Tamura, Katsunobu Sakurai, Kaoru Ryu, Tomoko Murata, Hironari Miyamoto, Satoshi Nishi, Sota Deguchi, Mikio Nambara, Yuichiro Miki, Mami Yoshii and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuro TamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Katsunobu SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kaoru RyuDepartment of Nursing, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Nursing, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko MurataDepartment of Nursing, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Nursing, Osaka, Japan.
Hironari MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi NishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Sota DeguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Mikio NambaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro MikiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Mami YoshiiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takahiro ToyokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoshi KuboDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroaki TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shigeru LeeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masaichi OhiraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Baba Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyoshi MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tokyo Metropolitan University · JPOsaka Metropolitan UniversityBaba Memorial Hospital · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPOsaka City University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: The concept of frailty has been attracting attention as a comprehensive indicator of the various effects of aging, but no conclusion has been reached on how to evaluate it. The present study investigated the adverse effect of preoperative frailty on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using a questionnaire about frailty. Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty-five patients with pathological stage (p Stage) I/II/III who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka, Japan from April 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. The frailty index (FI) was calculated by dividing the total score of 50 questions consisting of 1 point per question by 50. The study used multiple logistic regression analysis with 5-year overall survival (OS) as the endpoint to create a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cut-off point for the FI. The short- and long-term outcomes of the frail and non-frail groups were then compared, and prognostic factors for OS were examined. Results: Regarding the short-term outcomes, the postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. Regarding the 5-year OS rates of the patients with p Stages II/III, the outcomes in the frail group were significantly poorer than those in the non-frail group. In the multivariate analysis of OS, frailty was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with p Stages II/III gastric cancer. Conclusion: Frailty evaluation in this study may be useful in predicting long-term prognosis in patients undergoing surgical treatment for advanced gastric cancer.

Indexed as

Frailtygastric cancerpoor survivalquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37927806
PMCPMC10619566
OpenAlexW4388141603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.