Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927743›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shahzaib Maqbool, Muhammad Sajjad Ali, Abdur Rehman, Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Javed Iqbal, Azeen Razzaq, Amer Kamal, Shivani Shivamadhu Shivamadhu, Maham Afzal, Faizan Fazal and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Shahzaib MaqboolDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Muhammad Sajjad AliDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Abdur RehmanDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Mohammad Ebad Ur RehmanDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Javed IqbalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Azeen RazzaqDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Amer KamalDepartment of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Shivani Shivamadhu ShivamadhuDepartment of Medicine, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, IND.
Maham AfzalDepartment of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Faizan FazalDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Jawad BasitDepartment of Cardiology, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Syed Aizaz KhalidDepartment of Forensic, Federal Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Mayo Hospital · PKUniversity of Jordan · JOPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · PKRawalpindi Medical University · PKFatima Jinnah Medical University · PKM.S. Ramaiah Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of individualized anti-platelet therapy is of paramount significance in this era of cardiovascular advancement. This meta-analysis is also aiming to get more information relating to the effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A comprehensive literature search was done through various databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database Library from January 15, 2023, to February 23, 2023. After careful screening, eight articles with highly significant variables were involved in the synthesis of this meta-analysis. Data analysis was done through Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4; The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). In our study, ticagrelor and clopidogrel were evaluated in 10614 and 14662 patients, respectively. Ticagrelor was significantly superior to Clopidogrel in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001), risk of MI (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, p = 0.001), and stroke (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98, p = 0.04), but a higher risk of bleeding events was observed with Ticagrelor (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.79, p = 0.03). The two regimens were comparable in terms of stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor was found to be best in terms of reducing post-PCI myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all other mortality events in comparison to Clopidogrel. However, the bleeding events were of significant concern for the utilization of ticagrelor and required further investigations.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndrome (acs)cardiology researchclopidogrelpercutaneous coronary intervention (pci)ticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID37927743
PMCPMC10623206
OpenAlexW4387339907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.