ArticleCureus2023
Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma in a Young Female: A Diagnostic Dilemma.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hamartomas are non-neoplastic tissue abnormalities commonly found in various organs but rarely in the upper aerodigestive tract. Respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) is a rare benign proliferation affecting the nasal cavity and sinonasal tract. It often mimics other nasal masses, leading to diagnostic challenges. We present the case of a 25-year-old female with recurrent epistaxis and chronic bilateral nasal obstruction. Diagnostic endoscopy revealed a polypoidal mass, later confirmed as REAH through histopathological examination. CT scans demonstrated soft tissue opacity but no erosion of surrounding bony structures. The patient underwent endoscopic excision, and the excised mass exhibited characteristic histological features of REAH. Endoscopic excision with careful postoperative follow-up can lead to successful outcomes in REAH cases. A year of follow-up revealed no recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.