ReviewCureus2023
Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of fospropofol disodium on lipid metabolism and inflammatory response in patients with hyperlipidemia: a randomized trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Biochemical and pharmacological characterization of propofol infusion syndrome risk markers following high-dose propofol.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analgesic and sedative drug dosing in critically ill patients with Acute Kidney Injury undergoing different modalities of Kidney Replacement Therapy.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- [Drug-drug interactions in critically ill patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Propofol-related biological alterations and incidence of propofol infusion syndrome in status epilepticus: a 10-year cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Case report: Suspected propofol associated Heinz body anemia in five mechanically ventilated dogs: a historical case series.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Sedation Vacations in Neurocritical Care: Friend or Foe?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, yet life-threatening sequelae to prolonged administration of the anesthetic propofol in mechanically intubated patients. The condition is characterized by progressive multi-system organ failure and eventual mortality; of note, the predominant characteristics of PRIS involve but are not limited to cardiovascular impairment and collapse, metabolic and lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and acute renal failure. While potent or extended doses of propofol have been found to be the primary precipitating factor of this condition, others such as age, critical illness, steroid therapy, and hyperlipidemia have been discovered to play a role as well. This bibliometric analysis was done to reflect the current relevance and understanding of PRIS in recent literature. The SCOPUS database was utilized to conduct a search for articles with keywords "propofol infusion syndrome" and "propofol syndrome" from February 24, 2001, until April 16, 2023, with parameters for article title, citation number, citation per year, author, institution, publishing journal, and country of origin. PRIS was first defined in 1990, just a year after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration for use as a sedative-hypnotic. Since then, interest in PRIS slowly rose up to 13 publications per year in 2013. Seven papers on the topic were published in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.