ArticleCureus2023
Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Marital Relationships: Sleeping Together Again?
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Patient satisfaction with a clinically integrated sleep apnea care model vs. the current sleep care paradigm.Frontiers in sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective We assess the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment on the quality of marital relationships. Moreover, we evaluate the proportion of couples sleeping separately before treatment and whether there was any change after treatment began, which is still little explored in the literature. Methods A prospective study was conducted between April 2021 and April 2023, with users diagnosed with OSA in a level 2 hospital in Portugal. A questionnaire was applied before and after the start of treatment to both user and partner, which included questions on whether they slept together or separately, the disturbing factors of sleep quality, and satisfaction with the marital relationship. Statistical analysis was performed using R (version 4.2.2; R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Results Seventy questionnaires were applied, 79% to male users. Forty-one percent of users reported that they slept at least once or twice a month separated from their spouse, and, of these, 41% always slept in separate rooms. The chief complaints of partners not sleeping together were snoring (86%), restless sleep (17%), and witnessed apnea (14%). After treatment, 72.4% started to sleep together again, with a statistically significant difference in the condition before and after intervention. Among all patients, 69% said that their personal lives had improved and, when asked the same question to their spouse, 74% recognized the benefit of therapy. Conclusion Starting treatment positively influenced the quality of the marital relationship of users and their partners, with a statistically significant proportion of couples sleeping together again.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.