ArticleCureus2023
Itchy Skin: A Challenging Differential Diagnosis Between Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary cutaneous lymphomas represent a diverse spectrum of T-cell and B-cell lymphomas with their primary skin manifestation. Among these, mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) represent classic forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs). This report details the case of a 67-year-old female who presented with longstanding pruritic skin lesions, initially misdiagnosed and managed as eczema. The diagnostic process ultimately revealed the presence of Sézary cells in the peripheral blood smear (PBS). The SS diagnosis was confirmed based on CD4 positivity and CD7 negativity as determined by flow cytometry. The disease was staged as IVA1 (T2N0M1B2). The patient exhibited partial improvement with oral corticosteroid therapy. This report underscores the critical importance of integrating clinical evaluation and blood findings to distinguish between MF and SS. The progression of a circulating clone signals a poor prognosis, requiring surveillance and consideration of targeted therapies to enhance patient outcomes and improve their quality of life. Early detection remains paramount in the management of these rare cutaneous lymphomas, which are associated with unique therapeutic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.