Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927424›Full record

ArticleRenewable & sustainable energy reviews2023

A systematic literature review: building window's influence on indoor circadian health.

N Ghaeili Ardabili, J Wang, N Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N Ghaeili ArdabiliDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College (USA).
J WangDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College (USA).
N WangDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College (USA).

Funding

The Effect of Smart Ambient Bright Light for Nursing Home Residents with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasR21AG078544 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JAO, YING-LING, WANG, JULIAN · 2022 to 2023
$412k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG078544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light has been shown to have a non-visual impact on the biological aspects of human health, particularly on circadian rhythms. Building windows are a potential means of regulating daylight conditions for circadian health and well-being. As a result of advancements in window and glazing technologies and variations in outdoor solar/sky conditions, understanding daylight's spectral characteristics, which pass through building window systems, is complex. Therefore, a systematic review and summary of the knowledge and evidence available regarding windows' impact on human circadian health is necessary. This study provides an overview of research in this domain, compares approaches and evaluation metrics, and underscores the importance of window parameters' influence on circadian health. Published studies available on various online databases since 2012 were evaluated. The findings of this study define a holistic approach to the melanopic performance of windows and provide an overview of current knowledge regarding the effect of windows on circadian health. Additionally, this work identifies future research directions based on the studies reviewed. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the impact of windows on circadian health, which has implications for the design and construction of buildings in ways that support indoor human health and well-being from the circadian light adequacy perspective.

Indexed as

Circadian LightDaylightIndoor HealthNon-visual EffectWindow

Identifiers

PMID37927424
PMCPMC10621328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.