Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927380›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Effectiveness of community-based oral antiviral treatments against severe COVID-19 outcomes in people 70 years and over in Victoria, Australia, 2022: an observational study.

Christina Van Heer, Suman S Majumdar, Indra Parta, Marcellin Martinie, Rebecca Dawson, Daniel West, Laura Hewett, David Lister, Brett Sutton, Daniel P O'Brien and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comprehensive genotoxicity and carcinogenicity assessment of molnupiravir.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Van HeerDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Suman S MajumdarDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Indra PartaDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marcellin MartinieDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca DawsonDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel WestDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Laura HewettDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David ListerDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brett SuttonDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel P O'BrienBarwon South West Public Health Unit, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Benjamin C CowieDepartment of Health, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Government of Victoria · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUBarwon Health · AUBurnet Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral Antiviral (OAV) COVID-19 treatments are widely used, but evidence for their effectiveness against the Omicron variant in higher risk, vaccinated individuals is limited. Methods: Retrospective study of two vaccinated cohorts of COVID-19 cases aged ≥70 years diagnosed during a BA.4/5 Omicron wave in Victoria, Australia. Cases received either nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir as their only treatment. Data linkage and logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate the association between treatment and death and hospitalisation and compared with no treatment. Findings: Of 38,933 individuals in the mortality study population, 13.5% (n = 5250) received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, 51.3% (n = 19,962) received molnupiravir and 35.2% (n = 13,721) were untreated. Treatment was associated with a 57% (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.36-0.51) reduction in the odds of death, 73% (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.40) for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and 55% (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.38-0.54) for molnupiravir. Treatment was associated with a 31% (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86) reduction in the odds of hospitalisation, 40% (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.83) for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and 29% (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.87) for molnupiravir. Cases treated within 1 day of diagnosis had a 61% reduction in the odds of death (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.33-0.46) compared with 33% reduction for a delay of 4 or more days (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.44-0.97). Interpretation: Treatment with both nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir was associated with a reduction in death and hospitalisation in vaccinated ≥70 years individuals during the Omicron era. Timely, equitable treatment with OAVs is an important tool in the fight against COVID-19. Funding: There was no funding for this study.

Indexed as

Antiviral treatmentAustraliaCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID37927380
PMCPMC10622834
OpenAlexW4387298639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.