ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2023
BioBERTurk: Exploring Turkish Biomedical Language Model Development Strategies in Low-Resource Setting.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When AI feels more human: language and user experiences with ChatGPT.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Deep learning for named entity recognition in Turkish radiology reports.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- TurkMedNLI: a Turkish medical natural language inference dataset through large language model based translation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Biomedical and Health Informatics: A Review with Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Latest Highlights in Medical Natural Language Processing across Multiple Languages: A Survey.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pretrained language models augmented with in-domain corpora show impressive results in biomedicine and clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks in English. However, there has been minimal work in low-resource languages. Although some pioneering works have shown promising results, many scenarios still need to be explored to engineer effective pretrained language models in biomedicine for low-resource settings. This study introduces the BioBERTurk family and four pretrained models in Turkish for biomedicine. To evaluate the models, we also introduced a labeled dataset to classify radiology reports of head CT examinations. Two parts of the reports, impressions and findings, are evaluated separately to observe the performance of models on longer and less informative text. We compared the models with the Turkish BERT (BERTurk) pretrained with general domain text, multilingual BERT (mBERT), and LSTM+attention-based baseline models. The first model initialized from BERTurk and then further pretrained with biomedical corpus performs statistically better than BERTurk, multilingual BERT, and baseline for both datasets. The second model continues to pretrain the BERTurk model by using only radiology Ph.D. theses to test the effect of task-related text. This model slightly outperformed all models on the impression dataset and showed that using only radiology-related data for continual pre-training could be effective. The third model continues to pretrain by adding radiology theses to the biomedical corpus but does not show a statistically meaningful difference for both datasets. The final model combines radiology and biomedicine corpora with the corpus of BERTurk and pretrains a BERT model from scratch. This model is the worst-performing model of the BioBERT family, even worse than BERTurk and multilingual BERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.