Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927372›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2023

Sequence Labeling for Disambiguating Medical Abbreviations.

Mucahit Cevik, Sanaz Mohammad Jafari, Mitchell Myers, Savas Yildirim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mucahit CevikToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Sanaz Mohammad JafariToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Mitchell MyersToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Savas YildirimToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abbreviations are unavoidable yet critical parts of the medical text. Using abbreviations, especially in clinical patient notes, can save time and space, protect sensitive information, and help avoid repetitions. However, most abbreviations might have multiple senses, and the lack of a standardized mapping system makes disambiguating abbreviations a difficult and time-consuming task. The main objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of sequence labeling methods for medical abbreviation disambiguation. Specifically, we explore the capability of sequence labeling methods to deal with multiple unique abbreviations in a single text. We use two public datasets to compare and contrast the performance of several transformer models pre-trained on different scientific and medical corpora. Our proposed sequence labeling approach outperforms the more commonly used text classification models for the abbreviation disambiguation task. In particular, the SciBERT model shows a strong performance for both sequence labeling and text classification tasks over the two considered datasets. Furthermore, we find that abbreviation disambiguation performance for the text classification models becomes comparable to that of sequence labeling only when postprocessing is applied to their predictions, which involves filtering possible labels for an abbreviation based on the training data.

Indexed as

Abbreviation disambiguationMedical textSequence labelingTransformers models

Identifiers

PMID37927372
PMCPMC10620358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.