ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2023
Sequence Labeling for Disambiguating Medical Abbreviations.
Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chinese medical named entity recognition utilizing entity association and gate context awareness.PloS one · 2025Article
- Generative large language models are all-purpose text analytics engines: text-to-text learning is all your need.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Clinical Abbreviation Disambiguation.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abbreviations are unavoidable yet critical parts of the medical text. Using abbreviations, especially in clinical patient notes, can save time and space, protect sensitive information, and help avoid repetitions. However, most abbreviations might have multiple senses, and the lack of a standardized mapping system makes disambiguating abbreviations a difficult and time-consuming task. The main objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of sequence labeling methods for medical abbreviation disambiguation. Specifically, we explore the capability of sequence labeling methods to deal with multiple unique abbreviations in a single text. We use two public datasets to compare and contrast the performance of several transformer models pre-trained on different scientific and medical corpora. Our proposed sequence labeling approach outperforms the more commonly used text classification models for the abbreviation disambiguation task. In particular, the SciBERT model shows a strong performance for both sequence labeling and text classification tasks over the two considered datasets. Furthermore, we find that abbreviation disambiguation performance for the text classification models becomes comparable to that of sequence labeling only when postprocessing is applied to their predictions, which involves filtering possible labels for an abbreviation based on the training data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.