Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37927216›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024

Comparison of tight-fitting 7T parallel-transmit head array designs using excitation uniformity and local specific absorption rate metrics.

Ehsan Kazemivalipour, Lawrence L Wald, Bastien Guerin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Control of radiated emissions during MRI using parallel transmit: a path to eliminating the Faraday shielded room for 0.5T imaging.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. High-resolution quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Dual birdcage coils to control radiation from MRI systems operated without a Faraday cage.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ehsan KazemivalipourDepartment of Radiology, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4221-2397
Lawrence L WaldDepartment of Radiology, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8278-6307
Bastien GuerinDepartment of Radiology, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4746-0886

Funding

Parallel Excitation Methods for High Field MRIR01EB006847 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WALD, LAWRENCE L · 2007 to 2020
$5.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe model the performance of parallel transmission (pTx) arrays with 8, 16, 24, and 32 channels and varying loop sizes built on a close-fitting helmet for brain imaging at 7 T and compare their local specific absorption rate (SAR) and flip-angle performances to that of birdcage coil (used as a baseline) and cylindrical 8-channel and 16-channel pTx coils (single-row and dual-row).

methodsWe use the co-simulation approach along with MATLAB scripting for batch-mode simulation of the coils. For each coil, we extracted B

resultsHelmet designs outperformed cylindrical pTx arrays at a constant number of channels in the flip-angle uniformity at a constant local SAR metric: up to 29% for 8-channel arrays, and up to 34% for 16-channel arrays, depending on the slice orientation. For all helmet arrays, increasing the loop diameter led to better local SAR versus flip-angle uniformity tradeoffs, although this effect was more pronounced for the 8-channel and 16-channel systems than the 24-channel and 32-channel systems, as the former have more limited degrees of freedom and therefore benefit more from loop-size optimization.

conclusionHelmet pTx arrays significantly outperformed cylindrical arrays with the same number of channels in local SAR and flip-angle uniformity metrics. This improvement was especially pronounced for non-transverse slice excitations. Loop diameter optimization for helmets appears to favor large loops, compatible with nearest-neighbor decoupling by overlap.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainComputer SimulationHeadPhantoms, Imagingexcitation fidelitylocal specific absorption rate (SAR)parallel transmit (pTx)pTx coilspulse design

Identifiers

PMID37927216
PMCPMC10848211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.