ArticleEpilepsia open2024
Spatial and amplitude dynamics of neurostimulation: Insights from the acute intrahippocampal kainate seizure mouse model.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeurostimulation is an emerging treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, which is used to suppress, prevent, and terminate seizure activity. Unfortunately, after implantation and despite best clinical practice, most patients continue to have persistent seizures even after years of empirical optimization. The objective of this study is to determine optimal spatial and amplitude properties of neurostimulation in inhibiting epileptiform activity in an acute hippocampal seizure model.
methodsWe performed high-throughput testing of high-frequency focal brain stimulation in the acute intrahippocampal kainic acid mouse model of status epilepticus. We evaluated combinations of six anatomic targets and three stimulus amplitudes.
resultsWe found that the spike-suppressive effects of high-frequency neurostimulation are highly dependent on the stimulation amplitude and location, with higher amplitude stimulation being significantly more effective. Epileptiform spiking activity was significantly reduced with ipsilateral 250 μA stimulation of the CA1 and CA3 hippocampal regions with 21.5% and 22.2% reductions, respectively. In contrast, we found that spiking frequency and amplitude significantly increased with stimulation of the ventral hippocampal commissure. We further found spatial differences with broader effects from CA1 versus CA3 stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate that the effects of therapeutic neurostimulation in an acute hippocampal seizure model are highly dependent on the location of stimulation and stimulus amplitude. We provide a platform to optimize the anti-seizure effects of neurostimulation, and demonstrate that an exploration of the large electrical parameter and location space can improve current modalities for treating epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, we tested how electrical pulses in the brain can help control seizures in mice. We found that the electrode's placement and the stimulation amplitude had a large effect on outcomes. Some brain regions, notably nearby CA1 and CA3, responded positively with reduced seizure-like activities, while others showed increased activity. These findings emphasize that choosing the right spot for the electrode and adjusting the strength of electrical pulses are both crucial when considering neurostimulation treatments for epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.