ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Stool Antigen Test for Helicobacter pylori Infection in a Medical Checkup Setting: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Research advances of the establishment and characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Clinical Utility ofInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Of the highly accurate tests for current Helicobacter pylori infection, the urea breath test (UBT) and stool antigen test (SAT) are noninvasive and do not require endoscopy. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of the newly developed SAT in a medical checkup setting. Methods The accuracy of the proposed SAT was examined by determining H. pylori infection status based on a history of eradication therapy, endoscopic H. pylori infection diagnosis, and blood tests (serum H. pylori antibody, serum PG II) in individuals undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during a health checkup. Results The new SAT showed 97.3% (108/111) sensitivity for those "currently infected," as well as 99.3% (530/534), 98.0% (402/410), and 98.7% (932/944) specificity for those "never infected," those "previously infected," and those "never/previously infected", respectively. Conclusion The newly developed H. pylori SAT may be useful for diagnosing H. pylori infection. Patients should be suspected of being infected even after H. pylori eradication if they have a high cutoff index in this test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.