Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37926187›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in insect science2024

Direct sequencing of insect symbionts via nanopore adaptive sampling.

Jonathan H Badger, Rosanna Giordano, Aleksey Zimin, Robert Wappel, Senem M Eskipehlivan, Stephanie Muller, Ravikiran Donthu, Felipe Soto-Adames, Paulo Vieira, Inga Zasada and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in insect science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan H BadgerGenetics and Microbiome Core, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rosanna GiordanoInstitute of Environment, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Aleksey ZiminDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert WappelCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Senem M EskipehlivanCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Stephanie MullerCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Ravikiran DonthuCentre for Life Sciences, Mahindra University, Bahadurpally, Hyderabad 500043, India.
Felipe Soto-AdamesFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Department of Plant Industry, Gainesville, FL 32614, USA.
Paulo VieiraUSDA-ARS Agricultural Research Center, Mycology & Nematology Genetic Diversity & Biology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Inga ZasadaUSDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Sara GoodwinCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. Electronic address: sgoodwin@cshl.edu.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USBeltsville Agricultural Research Center · USFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · USFlorida International University · USHorticultural Crops Research Laboratory · USJohns Hopkins University · USMahindra Group (India) · INNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI David A Tuveson · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Computational Methods for Genome Assembly, Transcript Assembly, and Variant DiscoveryR01HG006677 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2025
$10.7M
Computational Methods for Microbial and Microbiome Sequence AnalysisR35GM130151 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Steven L. Salzberg · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
The Development and Optimization of Long-Read Sequencing Applications to Cancer Genomics in a Core SettingR50CA243890 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GOODWIN, SARA · 2019 to 2025
$920k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NCI NIH HHS R50 CA243890NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006677NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect symbionts can alter their host phenotype and their effects can range from beneficial to pathogenic. Moreover, many insects exhibit co-infections, making their study more challenging. Less than 1% of insect species have high-quality referenced genomes available and fewer still also have their symbionts sequenced. Two methods are commonly used to sequence symbionts: whole-genome sequencing to concomitantly capture the host and bacterial genomes, or isolation of the symbiont's genome before sequencing. These methods are limited when dealing with rare or poorly characterized symbionts. Long-read technology is an important tool to generate high-quality genomes as they can overcome high levels of heterozygosity, repeat content, and transposable elements that confound short-read methods. Oxford Nanopore (ONT) adaptive sampling allows a sequencing instrument to select or reject sequences in real time. We describe a method based on ONT adaptive sampling (subtractive) approach that readily permitted the sequencing of the complete genomes of mitochondria, Buchnera and its plasmids (pLeu, pTrp), and Wolbachia genomes in two aphid species, Aphis glycines and Pentalonia nigronervosa. Adaptive sampling is able to retrieve organelles such as mitochondria and symbionts that have high representation in their hosts such as Buchnera and Wolbachia, but is less successful at retrieving symbionts in low concentrations.

Indexed as

BuchneraNanoporesAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsInsectaDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID37926187
PMCPMC11793409
OpenAlexW4388347927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.