Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37925557›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Baseline markers of cortical excitation and inhibition predict response to theta burst stimulation treatment for youth depression.

Prabhjot Dhami, Sylvain Moreno, Paul E Croarkin, Daniel M Blumberger, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Faranak Farzan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02472470 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy and Biological Targets of Response to rTMS Therapy in Youth Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2015 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsDepressive SymptomsArmsrTMS
NCT03708172 nacompletednot on this map

rTMS and Cognitive Training for Treating Youth Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan2017 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsDepressionArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Cognitive Training, sham Cognitive Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prabhjot DhamiSchool of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0A3, Canada.
Sylvain MorenoSchool of Interactive Arts and Technology, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0A3, Canada.
Paul E CroarkinCollege of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-6503
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen St. W, Toronto, ON, M6J 1A8, Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen St. W, Toronto, ON, M6J 1A8, Canada.
Faranak FarzanSchool of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, 250-13450 102 Avenue, Surrey, BC, V3T 0A3, Canada. faranak.farzan@sfu.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a specific form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is a promising treatment for youth with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who do not respond to conventional therapies. However, given the variable response to TBS, a greater understanding of how baseline features relate to clinical response is needed to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment. In the current study, we sought to determine if baseline neurophysiology, specifically cortical excitation and/or inhibition, is associated with antidepressant response to TBS. In two independent open-label clinical trials, youth (aged 16-24 years old) with MDD underwent bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) TBS treatment. Clinical trial one and two consisted of 10 and 20 daily sessions of bilateral DLPFC TBS, respectively. At baseline, single-pulse TMS combined with electroencephalography was used to assess the neurophysiology of 4 cortical sites: bilateral DLPFC and inferior parietal lobule. Measures of cortical excitation and inhibition were indexed by TMS-evoked potentials (i.e., P30, N45, P60, N100, and P200). Depression severity was measured before, during and after treatment completion using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17. In both clinical trials, the baseline left DLPFC N45 and P60, which are believed to reflect inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms respectively, were predictors of clinical response. Specifically, greater (i.e., more negative) N45 and smaller P60 baseline values were associated with greater treatment response to TBS. Accordingly, cortical excitation and inhibition circuitry of the left DLPFC may have value as a TBS treatment response biomarker for youth with MDD.Clinical trial 1 registration number: NCT02472470 (June 15, 2015).Clinical trial 2 registration number: NCT03708172 (October 17, 2018).

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultDepressionEvoked PotentialsHumansPrefrontal CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37925557
PMCPMC10625527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.