Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37925495›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Quantum noise and its evasion in feedback oscillators.

Hudson A Loughlin, Vivishek Sudhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hudson A LoughlinLIGO Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. hudsonl@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-8711
Vivishek SudhirLIGO Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. vivishek@mit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback oscillators, consisting of an amplifier whose output is partially fed back to its input, provide stable references for standardization and synchronization. Notably, the laser is such an oscillator whose performance can be limited by quantum fluctuations. The resulting frequency instability, quantified by the Schawlow-Townes formula, sets a limit to laser linewidth. Here, we show that the Schawlow-Townes formula applies universally to feedback oscillators beyond lasers. This is because it arises from quantum noise added by the amplifier and out-coupler in the feedback loop. Tracing the precise origin of quantum noise in an oscillator informs techniques to systematically evade it: we show how squeezing and entanglement can enable sub-Schawlow-Townes linewidth feedback oscillators. Our analysis clarifies the quantum limits to the stability of feedback oscillators in general, derives a standard quantum limit (SQL) for all such devices, and quantifies the efficacy of quantum strategies in realizing sub-SQL oscillators.

Identifiers

PMID37925495
PMCPMC10625586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.