Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924662›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2024

Brain bases of morphological awareness and longitudinal word reading outcomes.

Rebecca A Marks, Rachel Eggleston, Ioulia Kovelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca A MarksUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: marksre@umich.edu.
Rachel EgglestonUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ioulia KovelmanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

Bilingual Children with DLD: A Neurodevelopmental PerspectiveR01HD109224 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI Ioulia Kovelman · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Bilingual and cross-cultural investigation of developmental dyslexiaR01HD111637 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ioulia Kovelman · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Impact of heritage language on bilingual children's path to English literacy (Diversity Supplement R01 HD092498)R01HD092498 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KOVELMAN, IOULIA · 2018 to 2023
$2.1M
Neurocognitive Foundations of Morphological Processing in Children with DyslexiaF32HD110967 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARKS, REBECCA · 2022 to 2024
$136k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD110967NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092498NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109224NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children's spoken language skills are essential to the development of the "reading brain," or the neurocognitive systems that underlie successful literacy. Morphological awareness, or sensitivity to the smallest units of meaning, is a language skill that facilitates fluent recognition of meaning in print. Yet despite the growing evidence that morphology is integral to literacy success, associations among morphological awareness, literacy acquisition, and brain development remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a longitudinal investigation with 75 elementary school children (5-11 years of age) who completed an auditory morphological awareness neuroimaging task at Time 1 as well as literacy assessments at both Time 1 and Time 2 (1.5 years later). Findings reveal longitudinal brain-behavior associations between morphological processing at Time 1 and reading outcomes at Time 2. First, activation in superior temporal brain regions involved in word segmentation was associated with both future reading skill and steeper reading gains over time. Second, a wider array of brain regions across the language network were associated with polymorphemic word reading as compared with broader word reading skill (reading both simple and complex words). Together, these findings reinforce the importance of word segmentation skills in learning to read and highlight the importance of considering complex word reading skills in building comprehensive neurocognitive models of literacy. This study fills a gap in our knowledge of how processing meaningful units in speech may help to explain differences in children's reading development over time and informs ongoing theoretical questions about the role of morphology in learning to read.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageAwarenessChildChild, PreschoolHumansLearningLiteracySpeechDevelopmentLongitudinalMorphological awarenessNeuroimagingWord reading

Identifiers

PMID37924662
PMCPMC10918614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.