ArticleFolia microbiologica2024
Activated mesenchymal stem cells increase drug susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring mesenchymal stem cells as a novel therapeutic approach for HACEK endocarditis: a narrative review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are major causes of hospital-acquired infections and sepsis. Due to increasing antibiotic resistance, new treatments are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have antimicrobial effects, which can be enhanced by preconditioning with antibiotics. This study investigated using antibiotics to strengthen MSCs against MRSA and P. aeruginosa. MSCs were preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin. Optimal antibiotic concentrations were determined by assessing MSC survival. Antimicrobial effects were measured by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and antimicrobial peptide (AMP) gene expression. Optimal antibiotic concentrations for preconditioning MSCs without reducing viability were 1 μg/mL for linezolid, meropenem, and cephalosporin and 2 μg/mL for vancomycin. In MIC assays, MSCs preconditioned with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin inhibited MRSA or P. aeruginosa growth at lower concentrations than non-preconditioned MSCs (p ≤ 0.001). In MBC assays, preconditioned MSCs showed enhanced bacterial clearance compared to non-preconditioned MSCs, especially when linezolid and vancomycin were used against MRSA (p ≤ 0.05). Preconditioned MSCs showed increased expression of genes encoding the antimicrobial peptide genes hepcidin and LL-37 compared to non-preconditioned MSCs. The highest hepcidin expression was seen with linezolid and vancomycin preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). The highest LL-37 expression was with linezolid preconditioning (p ≤ 0.001). MSCs' preconditioning with linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, or cephalosporin at optimal concentrations enhances their antimicrobial effects against MRSA and P. aeruginosa without compromising viability. This suggests preconditioned MSCs could be an effective adjuvant treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections. The mechanism may involve upregulation of AMP genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.