ArticleJAMA oncology2024
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequencing approaches in hereditary cancer testing: strengths, limitations and future directions.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Rare solid tumours as indicators of hereditary cancer syndromes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Multi-modal data integration reveals functionally credible predictive biomarkers in ovarian cancer.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Variant-specific RNA testing resolves variants of uncertain significance in exome testing.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Targeted reflex RNA sequencing for enhanced variant classification on exome and genome sequencing improves patient outcomes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Utility of Targeted RNA Analysis in Neurogenetic Disorders.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Variant Resolution Through RNA Testing and Affected Tissue Analysis in the Neurofibromatoses: A Case Series.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Mapping the Natural History of Benign DICER1-Related Lesions and Identifying Predictors of Malignancy.Fortune journal of health sciences · 2026Article
- Characterization of Copy Number Variants in Hereditary Cancer Patients Through NGS Shows a Distinctive PALB2 Contribution to the Diagnostic Yield.Human mutation · 2026Article
- RNA-Seq of Cultured Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes Improves Identification of Cryptic Splicing Defects in Rare Disease Diagnostics.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Causative Role of a NovelBiomedicines · 2026Article
- MutAnt: mutation annotation tool predicts deleteriousness of missense mutations and improves mutation calling from transcriptomics.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Long-read DNA and RNA sequencing for inherited polyposis and colorectal cancer: cryptic intronic variants and multiple mutational mechanisms.Journal of medical genetics · 2025Article
- Deciphering dual clinical entities associated with TP53 pathogenic variants: Insights from 53,085 HBOC panel analyses in French laboratories.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Association ofJCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Refining the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer screening through integrated RNA sequencing.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Identification of a novel variant inGastroenterology report · 2025Article
- Paired DNA/RNA testing uncovers a deep intronicFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in DNA/RNA Sequencing and Their Applications in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Personalized surveillance, prophylaxis, and cancer treatment options for individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition are informed by results of germline genetic testing. Improvements to genomic technology, such as the availability of RNA sequencing, may increase identification of individuals eligible for personalized interventions by improving the accuracy and yield of germline testing. Objective: To assess the cumulative association of paired DNA and RNA testing with detection of disease-causing germline genetic variants and resolution of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Design, Setting, and Participants: Paired DNA and RNA sequencing was performed on individuals undergoing germline testing for hereditary cancer indication at a single diagnostic laboratory from March 2019 through April 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and test results were curated as samples were received, and changes to variant classification were assessed over time. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were increase in diagnostic yield, decrease in VUS rate, the overall results by variant type, the association of RNA evidence with variant classification, and the corresponding predicted effect on cancer risk management. Results: A total of 43 524 individuals were included (median [range] age at testing, 54 [2-101] years; 37 373 female individuals [85.7%], 6224 male individuals [14.3%], and 2 individuals of unknown sex [<0.1%]), with 43 599 tests. A total of 2197 (5.0%) were Ashkenazi Jewish, 1539 (3.5%) were Asian, 3077 (7.1%) were Black, 2437 (5.6%) were Hispanic, 27 793 (63.7%) were White, and 2049 (4.7%) were other race, and for 4507 individuals (10.3%), race and ethnicity were unknown. Variant classification was impacted in 549 individuals (1.3%). Medically significant upgrades were made in 97 individuals, including 70 individuals who had a variant reclassified from VUS to pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) and 27 individuals who had a novel deep intronic P/LP variant that would not have been detected using DNA sequencing alone. A total of 93 of 545 P/LP splicing variants (17.1%) were dependent on RNA evidence for classification, and 312 of 439 existing splicing VUS (71.1%) were resolved by RNA evidence. Notably, the increase in positive rate (3.1%) and decrease in VUS rate (-3.9%) was higher in Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals combined compared to White individuals (1.6%; P = .02; and -2.5%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this diagnostic study demonstrate that the ability to perform RNA sequencing concurrently with DNA sequencing represents an important advancement in germline genetic testing by improving detection of novel variants and classification of existing variants. This expands the identification of individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition and increases opportunities for personalization of therapeutics and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.