Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924307›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2023

Adjunctive Medication Management and Contingency Management to enhance adherence to acamprosate for alcohol dependence: the ADAM trial RCT.

Kim Donoghue, Sadie Boniface, Eileen Brobbin, Sarah Byford, Rachel Coleman, Simon Coulton, Edward Day, Ranjita Dhital, Anum Farid, Laura Hermann and 16 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kim DonoghueResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7316-1716
Sadie BonifaceNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-6402
Eileen BrobbinNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-4847
Sarah ByfordInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's Health Economics, King's College London, London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7084-1495
Rachel ColemanFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3404-0839
Simon CoultonCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-3274
Edward DayInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-7013
Ranjita DhitalNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-7318
Anum FaridNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7658-1804
Laura HermannNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4688-6615
Amy JordanNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-7706
Andreas KimergårdNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2080-9865
Maria-Leoni KoutsouTavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-9853
Anne Lingford-HughesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-3453
John MarsdenNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-2498
Joanne NealeNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-5983
Aimee O'NeillFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5358-6944
Thomas PhillipsFaculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical and Applied Health Research (ICAHR), University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-4510
James ShearerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's Health Economics, King's College London, London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-9767
Julia SinclairFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-2025
Joanna SmithFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9306-9397
John StrangNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-2725
John WeinmanSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-0166
Cate WhittleseaResearch Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-2272
Kideshini WidyaratnaInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6783-776X
Colin DrummondNational Addictions Centre, Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-5452
King's College London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Hull · GBImperial College London · GBThe Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acamprosate is an effective and cost-effective medication for alcohol relapse prevention but poor adherence can limit its full benefit. Effective interventions to support adherence to acamprosate are therefore needed. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of Medication Management, with and without Contingency Management, compared to Standard Support alone in enhancing adherence to acamprosate and the impact of adherence to acamprosate on abstinence and reduced alcohol consumption. Design: Multicentre, three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting: Specialist alcohol treatment services in five regions of England (South East London, Central and North West London, Wessex, Yorkshire and Humber and West Midlands). Participants: Adults (aged 18 years or more), an Interventions: (1) Standard Support, (2) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management provided by pharmacists via a clinical contact centre (12 sessions over 6 months), (3) Standard Support with adjunctive Medication Management plus Contingency Management that consisted of vouchers (up to £120) to reinforce participation in Medication Management. Consenting participants were randomised in a 2 : 1 : 1 ratio to one of the three groups using a stratified random permuted block method using a remote system. Participants and researchers were not blind to treatment allocation. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: self-reported percentage of medication taken in the previous 28 days at 6 months post randomisation. Economic outcome: EuroQol-5 Dimensions, a five-level version, used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years, with costs estimated using the Adult Service Use Schedule. Results: Of the 1459 potential participants approached, 1019 (70%) were assessed and 739 (73 consented to participate in the study, 372 (50%) were allocated to Standard Support, 182 (25%) to Standard Support with Medication Management and 185 (25%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. Data were available for 518 (70%) of participants at 6-month follow-up, 255 (68.5%) allocated to Standard Support, 122 (67.0%) to Standard Support and Medication Management and 141 (76.2%) to Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management. The mean difference of per cent adherence to acamprosate was higher for those who received Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management (10.6%, 95% confidence interval 19.6% to 1.6%) compared to Standard Support alone, at the primary end point (6-month follow-up). There was no significant difference in per cent days adherent when comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support alone 3.1% (95% confidence interval 12.8% to -6.5%) or comparing Standard Support and Medication Management with Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management 7.9% (95% confidence interval 18.7% to -2.8%). The primary economic analysis at 6 months found that Standard Support and Medication Management with Contingency Management was cost-effective compared to Standard Support alone, achieving small gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a lower cost per participant. Cost-effectiveness was not observed for adjunctive Medication Management compared to Standard Support alone. There were no serious adverse events related to the trial interventions reported. Limitations: The trial's primary outcome measure changed substantially due to data collection difficulties and therefore relied on a measure of self-reported adherence. A lower than anticipated follow-up rate at 12 months may have lowered the statistical power to detect differences in the secondary analyses, although the primary analysis was not impacted. Conclusions: Medication Management enhanced with Contingency Management is beneficial to patients for supporting them to take acamprosate. Future work: Given our findings in relation to Contingency Management enhancing Medication Management adherence, future trials should be developed to explore its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness with other alcohol interventions where there is evidence of poor adherence. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN17083622 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17083622. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

AlcoholismAcamprosateAdultBehavior TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHumansMedication Therapy ManagementQuality of LifeAcamprosateACAMPROSATEALCOHOLISMBEHAVIOUR THERAPYCOST UTILITY ANALYSISMEDICATION ADHERENCEPHARMACISTSRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALSELF-REPORT

Identifiers

PMID37924307
PMCPMC10641712
OpenAlexW4388339532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.