Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924280›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2024

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vertebral Artery Injury After Cervical Spine Trauma.

Kartik Goyal, Jesvin T Sunny, Conor S Gillespie, Martin Wilby, Simon R Clark, Radek Kaiser, Michael G Fehlings, Nisaharan Srikandarajah

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Change in management for digital subtraction angiography-identified false-positive traumatic vertebral artery injury.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kartik GoyalDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5978-7504
Jesvin T SunnyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Conor S GillespieDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Martin WilbyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Simon R ClarkDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Radek KaiserDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-6364
Nisaharan SrikandarajahDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9578-508X
University of Liverpool · GBCharles University · CZUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

objectiveIdentify the incidence, mechanism of injury, investigations, management, and outcomes of Vertebral Artery Injury (VAI) after cervical spine trauma.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO-ID CRD42021295265). Three databases were searched (PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, CINAHL PLUS). Incidence of VAI, investigations to diagnose (Computed Tomography Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography), stroke incidence, and management paradigms (conservative, antiplatelets, anticoagulants, surgical, endovascular treatment) were delineated. Incidence was calculated using pooled proportions random effects meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 44 studies were included (1777 patients). 20-studies (n = 503) included data on trauma type; 75.5% (n = 380) suffered blunt trauma and 24.5% (n = 123) penetrating. The overall incidence of VAI was .95% (95% CI 0.65-1.29). From the 16 studies which reported data on outcomes, 8.87% (95% CI 5.34- 12.99) of patients with VAI had a posterior stroke. Of the 33 studies with investigation data, 91.7% (2929/3629) underwent diagnostic CTA; 7.5% (242/3629) underwent MRA and 3.0% (98/3629) underwent DSA. Management data from 20 papers (n = 475) showed 17.9% (n = 85) undergoing conservative therapy, anticoagulation in 14.1% (n = 67), antiplatelets in 16.4% (n = 78), combined therapy in 25.5% (n = 121) and the rest (n = 124) managed using surgical and endovascular treatments.

conclusionVAI in cervical spine trauma has an approximate posterior circulation stroke risk of 9%. Optimal management paradigms for the prevention and management of VAI are yet to be standardized and require further research.

Indexed as

cervical spineneck injuriesneck traumaspinal injuriesvertebral artery injury

Identifiers

PMID37924280
PMCPMC11289537
OpenAlexW4388340186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.