Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924130›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

A novel artificial vertebral implant with Gyroid porous structures for reducing the subsidence and mechanical failure rate after vertebral body replacement.

Peng Shang, Benyuan Ma, Guanghui Hou, Yihai Zhang, Lunxu Cui, Wanzhen Song, Yancheng Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Shang *School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China. 2008043@hebut.edu.cn.
Benyuan Ma *School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Guanghui HouSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Yihai ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Lunxu CuiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Wanzhen SongSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Yancheng LiuDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China. liutj2001@163.com.
Hebei University of Technology · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Fund Project of Hebei Province E2022202164Scientific Research Program of the Hebei Provincial Department of Education ZD2020124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsthesis subsidence and mechanical failure were considered significant threats after vertebral body replacement during the long-term follow-up. Therefore, improving and optimizing the structure of vertebral substitutes for exceptional performance has become a pivotal challenge in spinal reconstruction.

methodsThe study aimed to develop a novel artificial vertebral implant (AVI) with triply periodic minimal surface Gyroid porous structures to enhance the safety and stability of prostheses. The biomechanical performance of AVIs under different loading conditions was analyzed using the finite element method. These implants were fabricated using selective laser melting technology and evaluated through static compression and subsidence experiments.

resultsThe results demonstrated that the peak stress in the Gyroid porous AVI was consistently lower than that in the traditional porous AVI under all loading conditions, with a maximum reduction of 73.4%. Additionally, it effectively reduced peak stress at the bone-implant interface of the vertebrae. Static compression experiments demonstrated that the Gyroid porous AVI was about 1.63 times to traditional porous AVI in terms of the maximum compression load, indicating that Gyroid porous AVI could meet the safety requirement. Furthermore, static subsidence experiments revealed that the subsidence tendency of Gyroid porous AVI in polyurethane foam (simulated cancellous bone) was approximately 15.7% lower than that of traditional porous AVI.

conclusionsThe Gyroid porous AVI exhibited higher compressive strength and lower subsidence tendency than the strut-based traditional porous AVI, indicating it may be a promising substitute for spinal reconstruction.

Indexed as

SpineVertebral BodyBone-Implant InterfacePorosityProstheses and ImplantsStress, MechanicalArtificial vertebral implantFinite element analysisProsthetic reconstructionsSelective laser meltingTriply periodic minimal surface

Identifiers

PMID37924130
PMCPMC10623881
OpenAlexW4388291477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.