Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924051›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2023

Association between ventilatory ratio and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID 19: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Henry M Parada-Gereda, Janneth M Avendaño, Johana E Melo, Claudia I Ruiz, Margarita I Castañeda, Jorge Medina-Parra, Ricardo Merchán-Chaverra, Dinia Corzzo, Daniel Molano-Franco, Joan Ramón Masclans

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dead space in critical care: a practical approach with clinical scenarios.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry M Parada-GeredaIntensive Care Unit Clínica Reina Sofia, Clínica Colsanitas. Clinical Nutrition and Rehabilitation Research Group, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas. Grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia. maoparada1606@gmail.com.
Janneth M AvendañoIntensive Care Unit Clínica Reina Sofia, Mujer y Pediátrica, Clínica Colsanitas, Clinical Nutrition and Rehabilitation Research Group, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas. Grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Johana E MeloIntensive Care Unit Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Fundacion Universitaria Sanitas. Grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Claudia I RuizDepartment Clínica Reina Sofía, Clínica Reina Sofia, Mujer y Pediátrica. Grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Margarita I CastañedaDepartment Clínica Universitaria Colombia. Grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge Medina-ParraClinical Nutrition and Rehabilitation Research Group, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas. grupo Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ricardo Merchán-ChaverraClinical Nutrition and Rehabilitation Research Group, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas. Clinica Santa Maria del Lago. Grupo Keralty, Bogota, Colombia.
Dinia CorzzoIntensive Care Unit Clínica Reina Sofía, Intensive Care Unit Center of Cancer Research and Treatment (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Molano-FrancoIntensive Care Unit, Los Cobos Medical Center, Hospital San José, Center of Cancer Research and Treatment, Research Group Gribos, Bogotá, Colombia.
Joan Ramón MasclansCritical Care Department, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Fundación Universitaria Sanitas · COClínica Santa María · COHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMortality rates in patients with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit are high. The causes of this mortality have been rigorously investigated. The aim of the present study is to establish mortality risk factors related to lung mechanics measured at days 1 and 5 in patients with covid-19 ARDS managed with invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.

methodsA retrospective observational multicenter study including consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19-induced ARDS, admitted to three institutions and seven intensive care units in the city of Bogota between May 20, 2020 and May 30, 2022 who required mechanical ventilation for at least five days. Data were collected from the medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria on day 1 and day 5 of mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome assessed was mortality at day 30.

resultsA total of 533 consecutive patients admitted with ARDS with COVID-19 were included. Ventilatory ratio, plateau pressure and driving pressure measured on day 5 were significantly higher in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Overall, 30-day follow-up mortality was 48.8%. The increases between day 1 and day 5 in the ventilatory ratio (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.03-2.01, p = 0.04), driving pressure (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.10-2.22, p = 0.01); and finally plateau pressure (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.34-2.69, p = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of death. There was no association between deterioration of PaO

conclusionsVentilatory ratio, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and age were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 on day 5 of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesArtificial respirationCOVID-19MortalityRespiratory distress syndromeVentilatory ratio

Identifiers

PMID37924051
PMCPMC10623871
OpenAlexW4388292586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.