Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37924026›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations during endocrine therapy for advanced hormone-dependent endometrial carcinoma.

Aurélien Drouyer, Ludivine Beaussire, Pauline Jorda, Marianne Leheurteur, Cécile Guillemet, Anca Berghian, Dragos Georgescu, Frédéric Di Fiore, Anne Perdrix, Florian Clatot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aurélien DrouyerDepartment of Gynecology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France. aurelien.drouyer@chb.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0807-941X
Ludivine BeaussireRouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France.
Pauline JordaDepartment of Gynecology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
Marianne LeheurteurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
Cécile GuillemetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
Anca BerghianDepartment of Pathology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
Dragos GeorgescuDepartment of Surgery, Henri Becquerel Cancer Institute, Rouen, France.
Frédéric Di FioreRouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France.
Anne PerdrixRouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France.
Florian ClatotRouen Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, INSERM 1245, IRON group, Rouen, France.
Inserm · FRLaboratoire National Henri Becquerel · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndocrine therapy is frequently administered in patients with hormone dependent (HR+) metastatic endometrial cancer. ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance in HR + metastatic breast cancer and can be monitored using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and clinical relevance of circulating ESR1 mutations in patients treated by AI or megestrol acetate (M) for advanced endometrial carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: This single-center retrospective study was performed at the Henri Becquerel Center (Rouen) and looked for circulating ESR1 gene mutations by droplet digital PCR (E380Q, L536R, Y537S, Y537N, Y537C, D538G, S463P) in patients with advanced HR + endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2020 for at least 30 days by AI or M. Analyses were performed before exposure and at progression/during endocrine therapy.

resultsTwenty-two patients were included: 13 were treated with AI, 12 of whom progressed; 9 patients were treated with M, 8 of whom progressed. 68.1% of the patients had low-grade endometrial carcinoma and 54.5% had received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The median duration of treatment was 152 days (min 47 - max 629) with AI and 155 days (min 91-max 1297) with M. Under AI, there was no ESR1 mutation at baseline, and one Y537C mutation at progression with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.14%. Under M, one patient had a Y537C (VAF 0.2%) at baseline that disappeared during treatment. Another patient had a Y537S mutation emergence at progression after 91 days of treatment (VAF 1.83%). There was no significant difference between the circulating DNA concentration before and after hormone therapy (p = 0.16).

conclusionESR1 mutations do not seem to be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to AI or M in HR+ endometrial cancer. The clinical relevance of their detection is not demonstrated.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsClinical RelevanceEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHormonesHumansMutationRetrospective StudiesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaHormonesCirculating tumor DNADigital droplet PCREndometrial cancerESR1 mutation

Identifiers

PMID37924026
PMCPMC10625264
OpenAlexW4388291051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.