Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37923962›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Assessment of breast cancer chemotherapy dose reduction in an integrated healthcare delivery system.

Elizabeth D Kantor, Kelli O'Connell, Isaac J Ergas, Emily Valice, Janise M Roh, Jenna Bhimani, Narre Heon, Jennifer J Griggs, Jean Lee, Erin Ja Bowles and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Response to Yu, Wang, and Ge.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth D KantorDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA. kantore@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-5323
Kelli O'ConnellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Isaac J ErgasDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Emily ValiceDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Janise M RohDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Jenna BhimaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Narre HeonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 633 3rd Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Jennifer J GriggsDepartment of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology) and Health Management and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jean LeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Erin Ja BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Donna R RiveraSurveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Tatjana KolevskaKaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
Elisa V BanderaCancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, the State University of New Jersey, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA105274 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2004 to 2014
$19.9M
Infrastructure for Pathways, a Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipU01CA195565 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2016 to 2025
$18.8M
CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Obesity, chemotherapy dosing, and breast cancer outcomesR37CA222793 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KANTOR, ELIZABETH DAVID · 2018 to 2024
$4.0M
Group Health Cancer Research Program Research Specialist AwardR50CA211115 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BOWLES, ERIN JANELLE AIELLO · 2017 to 2021
$919k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105274NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222793NCI NIH HHS R37CA222793NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211115NCI NIH HHS R50CA211115NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195565NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost cytotoxic drugs are dosed using body surface area (BSA), yet not all cancer patients receive the full BSA-determined dose. Prior work suggests that breast cancer patients who are obese are more likely to experience dose reduction than normal weight patients. However, the factors driving dose reduction remain unclear.

methodsIn 452 women diagnosed with stage I-IIIA primary breast cancer at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, we evaluated the association between obesity and dose reduction, and further explored other factors in relation to dose reduction, including various sociodemographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, and comorbidities. Study participants were a part of the Pathways Study, diagnosed between 2006 and 2013 and treated with cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin, followed by paclitaxel (ACT). Dose reduction was assessed using first cycle dose proportion (FCDP) and average relative dose intensity (ARDI), a metric of dose intensity over the course of chemotherapy.

resultsOverall, 8% of participants received a FCDP < 90% and 21.2% had an ARDI < 90%, with dose reduction increasing with body mass index. In adjusted logistic regression models, obese women had 4.1-fold higher odds of receiving an ARDI < 90% than normal weight women (95% CI: 1.9-8.9; p-trend = 0.0006). Increasing age was positively associated with an ADRI < 90%, as was the presence of comorbidity. Dose reduction was less common in later calendar years.

conclusionResults offer insight on factors associated with chemotherapy dosing for a common breast cancer regimen. Larger studies are required to evaluate relevance to other regimens, and further work will be needed to determine whether dose reductions impact outcomes in obese women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFumaratesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocolsbeta-AlanineCyclophosphamideDrug TaperingFemaleHumansObesityRetrospective Studiesbeta-AlanineCyclophosphamideFumaratesN(beta)-fumarylcarboxyamido-2,3-diaminopropionic acidBody surface areaBreast cancerChemotherapyCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID37923962
PMCPMC10885738
OpenAlexW4388346891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.