Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37923899›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

DNA damage repair-related gene signature for identifying the immune status and predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yongpan Lu, Sen Wang, Tingting Chi, Yuli Zhao, Huimin Guo, Haizheng Wang, Li Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Research progress on the role of the NEIL family in cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongpan Lu *Department of Plastic Surgery, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Sen Wang *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Abdominal Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Tingting ChiDepartment of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, The Affiliated Qingdao Hai Ci Hospital of Qingdao University (West Hospital Area), Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
Yuli ZhaoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Abdominal Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Huimin GuoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Abdominal Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Jining Medical College, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Haizheng WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Abdominal Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China.
Li FengDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Abdominal Medical Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qian Foshan Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, No. 16766, Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China. qfsfengli@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3284-9247
Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNQingdao University · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a challenge for accurate prognosis prediction. DNA damage repair genes (DDRGs) have an impact on a wide range of malignancies. However, the relevance of these genes in HCC prognosis has received little attention. In this study, we aimed to develop a prognostic signature to identify novel therapy options for HCC. We acquired mRNA expression profiles and clinical data for HCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A polygenic prognostic model for HCC was constructed using selection operator Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage. The model was validated using International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) data. Overall survival (OS) between the high-risk and low-risk groups was compared using Kaplan‒Meier analysis. Independent predictors of OS were identified through both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. To determine immune cell infiltration scores and activity in immune-related pathways, a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was performed. The protein and mRNA expression levels of the prognostic genes between HCC and normal liver tissues were also examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). A novel ten-gene signature (CHD1L, HDAC1, KPNA2, MUTYH, PPP2R5B, NEIL3, POLR2L, RAD54B, RUVBL1 and SPP1) was established for HCC prognosis prediction. Patients in the high-risk group had worse OS than those in the low-risk group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed the predictive ability of this prognostic gene signature. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the risk score was an independent predictor of OS. Functional analysis revealed a strong association with cell cycle and antigen binding pathways, and the risk score was highly correlated with tumor grade, tumor stage, and types of immune infiltrate. High expression levels of the prognostic genes were significantly correlated with increased sensitivity of cancer cells to antitumor drugs. IHC, IF and qRT-PCR all indicated that the prognostic genes were highly expressed in HCC relative to normal liver tissue, consistent with the results of bioinformatics analysis. Ten DDRGs were utilized to create a new signature for identifying the immunological state of HCC and predicting prognosis. In addition, blocking these genes could represent a promising treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesCarrier ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA HelicasesHumansPrognosisRNA, MessengerATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesCarrier ProteinsCHD1L protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesRNA, MessengerRUVBL1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37923899
PMCPMC10624694
OpenAlexW4388292547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.