Observational studyScientific reports2023
Reproducibility of pulmonary function tests in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease in which interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Clinical management of the lung disease is mainly based on pulmonary function testing (PFT) and their changes over time. Little is known about the reproducibility of PFT testing in SSc patients. The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability and reproducibility of PFTs in SSc patients with or without ILD over 30 days in order determine the potential physiologic variation over the time. We performed prospective observational study of SSc patients. The FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, DLCO and KCO parameters were assessed in this population at four different timepoints; T0 (time 0) and H3 (T0 + 3 h) defined test-retest reliability, D15 (T0 + 15 days) and D30 (T0 + 30 days) for reproducibility. A mixed linear model was used to test the effect of time (and therefore reproducibility) on patients and we looked for an interaction. We included 25 SSc patients divided in two groups, 14 with ILD and 11 non-ILD. Interactions between time and group were not significant and were not reported. Time and group did not significantly influence the different measures of the PFT: FVC [p values time and group effect respectively (0.33; 0.34)], FEV1/FVC ratio (0.093; 0.056) and DLCO (0.99; 0.13) in the ILD and non ILD group (Table S2). The analyse with interactions between time and group were not significant and are not reported. We also used a Bland Altman test to assess reproducibility for FVC (L) and DLCO (mMKpa/min/L), Figs. 1 and 2 respectively. The measurements were therefore reproducible over time and in each group. PFT parameters are reproducible over time in a clinically stable population of SSc (no significant effect of the time T0, H3, D15 and D30) and there is no significant distinction between patients with ILD and no ILD. These respiratory functional data can further underline their use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.