ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning-based prediction models for parathyroid carcinoma using pre-surgery cognitive function and clinical features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A reliable and explainable deep learning framework for clinical-grade endocrine disorder risk prediction and decision support.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Exosomal miR-27a-5p Helps Differentiate Parathyroid Carcinoma From Adenoma and Inhibits Apoptosis in Parathyroid Carcinoma Cells.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Article
- Predictors of Hungry Bone Syndrome After Parathyroidectomy in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Narrative Review of Bone Turnover Biomarkers and Risk Prediction Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with parathyroid carcinoma (PC) are often diagnosed postoperatively, due to incomplete resection during the initial surgery, resulting in poor outcomes. The aim of our study was to investigate the pre-surgery indicators of PC and try to develop a predictive model for PC utilizing machine learning. Evaluation of pre-surgery neuropsychological function and confirmation of pathology were carried out in 133 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from December 2019 to January 2023. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 93) and a validating cohort (n = 40). Analysis of the clinical dataset, two machine learning including the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were utilized to develop the prediction model for PC. Logistic regression analysis was also conducted for comparison. Significant differences in elevated parathyroid hormone and decreased serum phosphorus in PC compared to (BP). The lower score of MMSE and MOCA was observed in PC and a cutoff of MMSE < 24 was the optimal threshold to stratify PC from BP (area under the curve AUC 0.699 vs 0.625). The predicted probability of PC by machine learning was similar to the observed probability in the test set, whereas the logistic model tended to overpredict the possibility of PC. The XGBoost model attained a higher AUC than the logistic algorithms and LASSO models. (0.835 vs 0.683 vs 0.607). Preoperative cognitive function may be a probable predictor for PC. The cognitive function-based prediction model based on the XGBoost algorithm outperformed LASSO and logistic regression, providing valuable preoperative assistance to surgeons in clinical decision-making for patients suspected PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.