ArticleScientific reports2023
How intra-source imbalanced datasets impact the performance of deep learning for COVID-19 diagnosis using chest X-ray images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of BiomedCLIP for Detecting Contrast Use and Esophageal Strictures in Pediatric Radiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of deep learning and omics data in transforming precision therapy for brain cancer.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Performance Comparison Between Two Versions of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence System for Chest Radiograph Interpretation: A Multicenter Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based risk factor analysis and prediction model construction for mortality in chronic heart failure.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- The power of deep learning in simplifying feature selection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, the use of deep learning has been widely increasing in the medical image diagnosis field. Deep learning-based methods' (DLMs) performance strongly relies on training data. Therefore, researchers often focus on collecting as much data as possible from different medical facilities or developing approaches to avoid the impact of inter-category imbalance (ICI), which means a difference in data quantity among categories. However, due to the ICI within each medical facility, medical data are often isolated and acquired in different settings among medical facilities, known as the issue of intra-source imbalance (ISI) characteristic. This imbalance also impacts the performance of DLMs but receives negligible attention. In this study, we study the impact of the ISI on DLMs by comparison of the version of a deep learning model that was trained separately by an intra-source imbalanced chest X-ray (CXR) dataset and an intra-source balanced CXR dataset for COVID-19 diagnosis. The finding is that using the intra-source imbalanced dataset causes a serious training bias, although the dataset has a good inter-category balance. In contrast, the deep learning model performed a reliable diagnosis when trained on the intra-source balanced dataset. Therefore, our study reports clear evidence that the intra-source balance is vital for training data to minimize the risk of poor performance of DLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.