Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37923384›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2024

Paediatric intensive care admissions of preterm children born <32 weeks gestation: a national retrospective cohort study using data linkage.

Tim J van Hasselt, Chris Gale, Cheryl Battersby, Peter J Davis, Elizabeth Draper, Sarah E Seaton, United Kingdom Neonatal Collaborative and the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG)

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tim J van HasseltDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK t.vanhasselt@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-1083
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-876X
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-553X
Peter J DavisPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth DraperDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sarah E SeatonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8711-4817
United Kingdom Neonatal Collaborative and the Paediatric Critical Care Society Study Group (PCCS-SG)
University of Leicester · GBFaculty of Public Health · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurvival of babies born very preterm (<32 weeks gestational age) has increased, although preterm-born children may have ongoing morbidity. We aimed to investigate the risk of admission to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) of children born very preterm following discharge home from neonatal care.

designRetrospective cohort study, using data linkage of National Neonatal Research Database and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network datasets.

settingAll neonatal units and PICUs in England and Wales. PATIENTS: Children born very preterm between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018 and admitted to neonatal units.

main outcome measuresAdmission to PICU after discharge home from neonatal care, before 2 years of age.

resultsOf the 40 690 children discharged home from neonatal care, there were 2308 children (5.7%) with at least one admission to PICU after discharge. Of these children, there were 1901 whose first PICU admission after discharge was unplanned.The percentage of children with unplanned PICU admission varied by gestation, from 10.2% of children born <24 weeks to 3.3% born at 31 weeks.Following adjustment, unplanned PICU admission was associated with lower gestation, male sex (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.79), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (aOR 1.37), necrotising enterocolitis requiring surgery (aOR 1.39) and brain injury (aOR 1.42). For each week of increased gestation, the aOR was 0.90.

conclusionsMost babies born <32 weeks and discharged home from neonatal care do not require PICU admission in the first 2 years. The odds of unplanned admissions to PICU were greater in the most preterm and those with significant neonatal morbidity.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalIntensive Care Units, PediatricChildCritical CareFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective Studiesintensive care units, neonatalintensive care units, paediatricneonatologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID37923384
PMCPMC11041566
OpenAlexW4388287121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.